Doe v. WebGroup Czech Republic, AS, et al.
| JANE DOE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated |
| WEBGROUP CZECH REPUBLIC, AS, WGCZ HOLDING, AS, WGCZ LIMITED, SRO, NKL ASSOCIATES SRO, TRAFFIC F, SRO, GTFLIX TV, SRO, FTCP, SRO, HC MEDIA, SRO and FBP MEDIA SRO |
| 25-2424 |
| April 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Appellees is received.--[[COURT UPDATE: corrected text] [Entered: 09/15/2025 09:48 AM] [Edited: 09/16/2025 11:10 AM] |
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 21) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 10/29/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/11/2025 03:48 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Appellees is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/11/2025 10:12 AM]
|
| Filing 21 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Jane Doe. [Entered: 09/11/2025 07:29 AM] |
| Filing 19 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee WebGroup Czech Republic, AS, Appellee WGCZ Holding, AS, Appellee WGCZ Limited, SRO, Appellee NKL Associates SRO, Appellee Traffic F, SRO, Appellee GTFlix TV, SRO, Appellee FTCP, SRO, Appellee HC Media, SRO, Appellee FBP Media SRO. [Entered: 09/09/2025 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee WebGroup Czech Republic, AS, Appellee WGCZ Holding, AS, Appellee WGCZ Limited, SRO, Appellee NKL Associates SRO, Appellee Traffic F, SRO, Appellee GTFlix TV, SRO, Appellee FTCP, SRO, Appellee HC Media, SRO, Appellee FBP Media SRO. [Entered: 09/10/2025 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee WebGroup Czech Republic, AS, Appellee WGCZ Holding, AS, Appellee WGCZ Limited, SRO, Appellee NKL Associates SRO, Appellee Traffic F, SRO, Appellee GTFlix TV, SRO, Appellee FTCP, SRO, Appellee HC Media, SRO, Appellee FBP Media SRO.--[incorrect entry, correct entry at DE 20] [Entered: 09/08/2025 07:39 PM] [Edited: 09/11/2025 09:51 AM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 16) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/8/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/17/2025 12:59 PM]
|
| Filing 16 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee WebGroup Czech Republic, AS, Appellee WGCZ Holding, AS, Appellee WGCZ Limited, SRO, Appellee NKL Associates SRO, Appellee Traffic F, SRO, Appellee GTFlix TV, SRO, Appellee FTCP, SRO, Appellee HC Media, SRO, Appellee FBP Media SRO. [Entered: 07/17/2025 07:15 AM] |
| Filing 15 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 3 Volumes and Index Volume submitted at DE 12 by Appellant Jane Doe received. [Entered: 07/09/2025 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 14 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellant Jane Doe received. [Entered: 07/09/2025 09:50 AM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellant Jane Doe is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 12 by Appellant Jane Doe are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/07/2025 03:23 PM]
|
| Filing 12 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Jane Doe. [Entered: 07/07/2025 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Jane Doe. [Entered: 07/07/2025 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Jeremy Wallace Dunbar [Entered: 06/13/2025 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeremy Wallace Dunbar for Appellee FBP Media SRO, Appellee FTCP, SRO, Appellee GTFlix TV, SRO, Appellee HC Media, SRO, Appellee NKL Associates SRO, Appellee Traffic F, SRO, Appellee WebGroup Czech Republic, AS, Appellee WGCZ Holding, AS, Appellee WGCZ Limited, SRO. [Entered: 06/13/2025 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 8 Attorney Adam Banks as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Michael Thomas Zeller, Michael Ernest Williams, Dylan Bonfigli. [Entered: 06/05/2025 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Adam Banks for Appellee FBP Media SRO, Appellee FTCP, SRO, Appellee GTFlix TV, SRO, Appellee HC Media, SRO, Appellee NKL Associates SRO, Appellee Traffic F, SRO, Appellee WebGroup Czech Republic, AS, Appellee WGCZ Holding, AS, Appellee WGCZ Limited, SRO replacing Dylan Bonfigli, Michael Thomas Zeller, Michael Ernest Williams. [Entered: 06/05/2025 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Jane Doe. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 04/21/2025 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Vanessa L. Huber for Appellant Jane Doe. [Entered: 04/17/2025 06:42 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kevin Dooley Kent for Appellant Jane Doe. [Entered: 04/17/2025 05:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mark B. Schoeller for Appellant Jane Doe. [Entered: 04/17/2025 05:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 4/21/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 4/25/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 5/26/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/7/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/7/2025. For appeal no. 25-2424, 2:21-cv-02428-SPG-SK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-02428-SPG-SK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2424 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
