Bennetti v. Thornell, et al.
Petitioner: DINO JOSEPH BENNETTI, also named Dino Bennetti
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Case Number: 25-2431
Filed: April 15, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2025 Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH [Entered: 06/18/2025 08:55 AM]
May 28, 2025 Filing 4 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the 05/27/2025 order of the court per his change in address. [Entered: 05/28/2025 09:10 AM]
May 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. (William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 25, 2025 magistrate judge order is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also Flam v. Flam, 788 F.3d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir. 2015) (magistrate judge may hear and determine non-dispositive matters under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/27/2025 03:14 PM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. No COA order in district court. [Entered: 04/15/2025 04:38 PM]
April 15, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00169-DWL-JFM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2431 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/15/2025 04:33 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bennetti v. Thornell, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DINO JOSEPH BENNETTI, also named Dino Bennetti
Represented By: Dino Joseph Bennetti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION
Represented By: Ms. Deborah Ann Bigbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Represented By: Ms. Deborah Ann Bigbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?