Benshoof, et al. v. City of Shoreline, et al.
| KURT BENSHOOF, BRIANA D. GAGE and URVE MAGGITTI |
| CITY OF SHORELINE, WILLIAM C. AKERS, THOMPSON, Mr., JAMPA TSETEN, NICHOLAS W. DEMUSE, EVAN B. FAGAN, COUNTY OF KING, TOWN & COUNTRY MARKETS, INC., COURTNEY J. OLSON, ATTORNEY, ANN M. SUMMERS and ADAM RICHARD ASHER, TRIAL ATTORNEY |
| 25-2449 |
| April 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 10/08/2025 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 19 MAIL RETURNED. DE 17 addressed to Appellant Briana D. Gage. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 10/03/2025 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Recall Mandate filed by Appellant Kurt Benshoof. [Entered: 09/18/2025 11:40 AM] |
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. This courts August 7, 2025, order stated: If the opening brief is not submitted within 21 days of this order, the mandate will become effective. The opening brief was not filed within 21 days and still has not been filed. The mandate became effective on August 28, 2025, and the motions (Docket Entry Nos. 14 & 15) to correct the record are denied as moot. This case remains closed. [Entered: 09/08/2025 03:05 PM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Courtney J. Olson. [Entered: 09/05/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 15 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Supplement or Correct Record (DE 14) filed by Appellant Urve Maggitti. [Entered: 09/04/2025 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record filed by Appellant Urve Maggitti. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 12 & 13.] [Entered: 09/04/2025 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Urve Maggitti. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 14.] [Entered: 09/03/2025 08:36 PM] [Edited: 09/04/2025 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE---MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Urve Maggitti. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 14.] [Entered: 09/03/2025 07:38 PM] [Edited: 09/04/2025 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellee City of Shoreline, Appellee William C. Akers, Appellee Thompson, Appellee Jampa Tseten, Appellee Nicholas W. DeMuse, Appellee County of King, Appellee Ann M. Summers. [Entered: 08/13/2025 10:02 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The motion to reinstate this appeal (Docket Entry No. 5) does not include the opening brief. See 9th Cir. Gen. Order 2.4. If the opening brief is submitted within 21 days of this order, the court will consider the motion to reinstate. If the opening brief is not submitted within 21 days of this order, the mandate will become effective. [Entered: 08/07/2025 11:36 AM]
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant Kurt Benshoof. [Entered: 07/28/2025 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 MAIL RETURNED. DE 4 addressed to Appellant Briana D. Gage. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 07/16/2025 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion to Reopen Administratively Closed Case (DE 5) filed by Appellee City of Shoreline, Appellee William C. Akers, Appellee Thompson, Appellee Jampa Tseten, Appellee Nicholas W. DeMuse, Appellee County of King, Appellee Ann M. Summers. [Entered: 07/01/2025 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion to Reopen Administratively Closed Case (DE 5) filed by Appellee Courtney J. Olson. [Entered: 06/27/2025 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Reopen Administratively Closed Case filed by Appellant Kurt Benshoof. [Entered: 06/21/2025 09:06 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Appellants did not file the opening brief by the due date. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 06/20/2025 12:22 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Briana D. Gage. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 05/08/2025 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/27/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/25/2025. For appeal no. 25-2449, 2:24-cv-00343-TL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/16/2025 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-00343-TL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2449 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/16/2025 02:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
