G.B., et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
| G.B., a minor, by and through her Guardian G.P., M.W., a minor, by and through her Guardian R. W., Z.M., a minor, by and through his Guardian S.W., M.M., a minor, by and through his Guardian S.W., D.R., a minor, by and through her Guardian A.P., M.D., a minor, by and through her Guardian S.A., N.C., a minor, by and through their Guardian N.M., I.W., a minor, by and through her Guardian C.W., A.L., a minor, by and through her Guardian E.L., H.A., a minor, by and through his Guardian R.A., E.W., a minor, by and through her Guardian S.W., A.J., a minor, by and through their Guardian A.J., L.H., a minor, by and through her Guardian R.H., D.S., a minor, by and through his Guardian R.K., M. A., a minor, by and through her Guardian M.T., M. R., a minor, by and through their Guardian M.R., A. S., a minor, by and through his Guardian P.S. and N. R., a minor, by and through their Guardian S.R. |
| UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEE ZELDIN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, RUSSELL VOUGHT, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and UNITED STATES OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET |
| CHILDREN AND YOUTH LAW CLINIC - UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW, KARI C. NADEAU, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE CLINIC - UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF LAW, EBAN GODSTEIN, ROBIN HAHNEL, ELIZABETH A. STANTON, JAMES K. BOYCE, GERALD EPSTEIN, MICHAEL ASH, BRYNDIS WOODS, JORDAN BURT, TANYA STASIO, NAOMI BARDACH, BRUCE BEKKA, LUIS CASTELLANOS, CRYSTAL DOAN STEPHENS, REBECCA DUDOVITZ, MARICOR C. JAVIER, SYDNEY LEIBEL, HILARY LIN, KATHERINE MANDEVILLE, KARINA MAHER, CYNTHIA MAHONEY, ASHLEY MCCLURE, AMANDA MILLSTEIN, KARI NADEAU, VI NGUYEN, PRIYANKA PATEL, ANTHONY PROAI, WENDY RING, ALEX SHERRIFFS, LAURIE TYRRELL, JONG YUN, VANESSA FORSYTHE, SUNEEL BANERJEE, SOPHIE CHANGLAUREN CUETO, CINDY FLORES, DANIELLE GALLANDT, CARLOS ANTONIO GARCIA TOVAR, DANIELLE HJERPE, SANDY HU, ANISAH HUSMAN, ANGELA FRANCESCA JIMENEZ, JOSEPH-CAMRON JOHNSTON, ERIN KIM, ELIDA KOCHARIAN, JESSE KUEHN, GABRIELA LOPEZ RUANO, ISABELLA MOLINA, KAT NURMINSKY, MIRANDA OLSON, MONIQUE ORTIZ, CLAIRE PERRIN, ROHINI PRABHAKAR, NAREN RAMESH, LUI SUZUKI-WILLIAMS, SABEECA VADAKKAN, DAISY VALDIVIESO, JONATHAN LU, AAP-CA3 CLIMATE CHANGE & HEALTH COMMITTEE, CLIMATE HEALTH NOW and UCSD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE PLANETARY HEALTH STUDENT INTEREST GROUP |
| 25-2473 |
| April 17, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| G.B., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL. |
 G.B. V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 TEXT ORDER FILED.The motion (Docket Entry No. 35) is unnecessary because filing deadlines in this case are stayed. See #October 1, 2025, Supplemental Administrative Order. [Entered: 10/07/2025 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 35 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee United States Environmental Protection Agency, Appellee United States of America, Appellee Lee Zeldin, Appellee United States Office of Management and Budget, Appellee Russell Vought. [Entered: 10/01/2025 08:53 AM] |
| Filing 34 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 33) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due October 3, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 08/28/2025 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 33 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee United States Environmental Protection Agency, Appellee United States of America, Appellee Lee Zeldin, Appellee United States Office of Management and Budget, Appellee Russell Vought. [Entered: 08/27/2025 11:06 AM] |
Filing 32
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 30) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/3/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/28/2025 01:48 PM]
|
| Filing 31 ADDED Amici Curiae AAP-CA3 Climate Change & Health Committee, Climate Health Now, UCSD School of Medicine Planetary Health Student Interest Group; Counsel for Amici Curiae: Alison S. Gaffney. [Entered: 07/28/2025 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 30 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee United States Environmental Protection Agency, Appellee United States of America, Appellee Lee Zeldin, Appellee United States Office of Management and Budget, Appellee Russell Vought. [Entered: 07/28/2025 08:39 AM] |
| Filing 29 CLERK ACTION: Amicus Brief submitted at DE 26 by Elizabeth A. Stanton, et al. is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 07/25/2025 12:06 PM] |
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. The order filed at Docket Entry No. 27 was filed in error and is vacated. [Entered: 07/25/2025 12:03 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Amicus Brief submitted at DE 26 by Elizabeth A. Stanton, et al. is filed. Amici must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with green front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be placed in the mail or dispatched to a commercial carrier or courier within 7 days of this order and addressed to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/25/2025 11:03 AM]
|
| Filing 25 ADDED Amici Curiae Eban Godstein, Robin Hahnel, James K. Boyce, Gerald Epstein, Michael Ash, Bryndis Woods, Jordan Burt, Tanya Stasio; Counsel for Amicus Curiae: Matthew I. Summers. [Entered: 07/25/2025 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 26 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Economists and Economics Scholars.--[court entered filing to correct DE 23] [Entered: 07/25/2025 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 24 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Amici Curiae Dr. Kari C. Nadeau, Medical Professionals and Health Advocacy Organizations. [Entered: 07/23/2025 05:42 PM] |
| Filing 23 DEFECTIVE --- LETTER BRIEF submitted for filing by Amicus Curiae Elizabeth A. Stanton.--[incorrect entry, correct entry at DE 26] [Entered: 07/23/2025 05:16 PM] [Edited: 07/25/2025 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 22 Paper copies (6) of Amicus Brief submitted at DE 18 by Children and Youth Law Clinic and the Environmental Justice Clinic received. [Entered: 07/17/2025 03:49 PM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Amicus Brief submitted at DE 18 by Children and Youth Law Clinic and the Environmental Justice Clinic is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Amicus must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with green front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/10/2025 11:56 AM]
|
| Filing 20 ADDED Amici Curiae Children and Youth Law Clinic - University of Miami School of Law, Environmental Justice Clinic - University of Miami School of Law; Counsel for Amici Curiae: Douglas Avery Ruley. [Entered: 07/10/2025 11:53 AM] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) of Economists and Economics Scholars for an extension of time to file an amicus brief is granted. Any amicus brief pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a)(2) or motion for leave to file an amicus brief by Economists and Economics Scholars is due July 23, 2025. The answering brief remains due August 4, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/09/2025 12:20 PM]
|
| Filing 18 AMICUS BRIEF by government or with consent submitted for filing by Children's Rights Advocates. [Entered: 07/09/2025 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 17 ADDED Amici Curiae - Pending Elizabeth A. Stanton, Kari C. Nadeau; Counsel for Amici Curiae - Pending: Matthew I. Summers, Daniel Parke Mensher. [Entered: 07/08/2025 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellants received. [Entered: 07/08/2025 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 15 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 3 Volumes and Index Volume submitted at DE 12 by Appellants received. [Entered: 07/08/2025 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Extend Time to File Amicus Brief filed by Amici Curiae Dr. Kari C. Nadeau, et al. [Entered: 07/07/2025 11:57 AM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellants is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellants must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 12 by Appellants are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellants must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/02/2025 12:04 PM]
|
| Filing 12 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant G.B., Appellant M.W., Appellant M.A., Appellant Z.M., Appellant M.M., Appellant D.R., Appellant M.R., Appellant M.D., Appellant N.C., Appellant I.W., Appellant A.S., Appellant A.L., Appellant H.A., Appellant N.R., Appellant E.W., Appellant A.J., Appellant L.H., Appellant D.S.. [Entered: 07/02/2025 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant G.B., Appellant M.W., Appellant M.A., Appellant Z.M., Appellant M.M., Appellant D.R., Appellant M.R., Appellant M.D., Appellant N.C., Appellant I.W., Appellant A.S., Appellant A.L., Appellant H.A., Appellant N.R., Appellant E.W., Appellant A.J., Appellant L.H., Appellant D.S.. [Entered: 07/02/2025 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time to File Amicus Brief filed by Economists and Economics Scholars as Amici Curiae.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 7/8/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 07/01/2025 01:24 PM] [Edited: 07/08/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 9 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 05/15/2025 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 5/15/2025, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 04/24/2025 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Christopher Anderson [Entered: 04/24/2025 08:39 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Anderson for Appellee Lee Zeldin, Appellee Office of Management and Budget, Appellee Russell Vought, Appellee United States Environmental Protection Agency, Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 04/24/2025 05:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant G.B., Appellant M.W., Appellant M.A., Appellant Z.M., Appellant M.M., Appellant D.R., Appellant M.R., Appellant M.D., Appellant N.C., Appellant I.W., Appellant A.S., Appellant A.L., Appellant H.A., Appellant N.R., Appellant E.W., Appellant A.J., Appellant L.H., Appellant D.S.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 04/22/2025 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 4 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Andrew Coghlan, representing Appellee Lee Zeldin, Appellee Office of Management and Budget, Appellee Russell Vought, Appellee United States Environmental Protection Agency, Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 04/17/2025 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Andrew Coghlan. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 04/17/2025 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 4/22/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 4/25/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 5/26/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/2/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/4/2025. For appeal no. 25-2473, 2:23-cv-10345-MWF-AGR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/17/2025 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-10345-MWF-AGR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2473 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/17/2025 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
