Lizarraga v. Allied Universal Security Services, LLC, et al.
| OMAR JONATHAN LIZARRAGA |
| ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES, LLC, TONY TOWNS, Branch Recruiter, COLLIN CIEPIOLA, Allied Universal; Attorney-Legal Services Group, MARLENE MONTES, Assistant Account Manager DPSS and ARIANNA ZUNIGA, Branch Human Resource Coordinator |
| 25-2721 |
| April 28, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 13) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary because briefing is stayed pending resolution of appellant's motion (DE 3) for appointment of counsel and appellant's motion ( DE 8) to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See 9th Cir. Rule 27-11. [Entered: 05/13/2025 02:40 PM]
|
| Filing 12 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 05/13/2025 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 10 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 05/12/2025. [Entered: 05/13/2025 08:17 AM] |
| Filing 13 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/13/2025 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/13/2025 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 9 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Omar Jonathan Lizarraga. [Entered: 05/12/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/9/2025. For appeal no. 25-2721, 2:25-cv-00166-RGK-AGR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/28/2025 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00166-RGK-AGR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2721 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/28/2025 03:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.