Tyler v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
Petitioner: MATHEW L. TYLER
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest: 118TH UNITED STATES CONGRESS, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, BENJAMIN C. MIZER, in official capacity as Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, SHIRLEY WEBER, in her official capacity as California Secretary of State, FIONA MA, in her official capacity as California State Treasurer, JAMES GALLAGHER, in official capacity as California Assemblyman, LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, Utah, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UTAH, NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RHODE ISLAND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY OFFICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: 25-2733
Filed: April 29, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. (William A. FLETCHER, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, Lucy H. KOH) On May 19, 2025, the magistrate judge filed an order of recusal. The petition for a writ of mandamus is therefore denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [Entered: 05/21/2025 11:06 AM]
May 19, 2025 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition (DE 1) filed by Petitioner Mathew L. Tyler. [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:45 PM]
May 19, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Mathew L. Tyler. [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:32 PM]
April 29, 2025 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 04/29/2025 07:46 AM]
April 29, 2025 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/28/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2733 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 04/29/2025 07:44 AM]
April 28, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Mathew L. Tyler. [Entered: 04/29/2025 07:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tyler v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MATHEW L. TYLER
Represented By: Mathew L. Tyler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: 118TH UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY - NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: BENJAMIN C. MIZER, in official capacity as Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: SHIRLEY WEBER, in her official capacity as California Secretary of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: FIONA MA, in her official capacity as California State Treasurer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: JAMES GALLAGHER, in official capacity as California Assemblyman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, Utah
Represented By: Stephen Wendell Geary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF UTAH
Represented By: Stephen Wendell Geary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Represented By: Mr. Rory Stuart Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: RHODE ISLAND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?