Harvey v. Banner Health
| JOHN CLAYTON HARVEY |
| BANNER HEALTH |
| 25-2783 |
| April 30, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 18 by Appellant John Clayton Harvey is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 08/22/2025 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 18 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant John Clayton Harvey.--[court entered filing to correct DE 17] [Entered: 08/22/2025 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant John Clayton Harvey.--[incorrect entry, correct entry at DE 17] [Entered: 08/21/2025 03:52 PM] [Edited: 08/22/2025 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 16 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed--[court entered filing to correct DE 15] [Entered: 08/20/2025 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE --- SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant John Clayton Harvey.--[incorrect entry, correct entry at DE 16] [Entered: 08/18/2025 05:06 PM] [Edited: 08/20/2025 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 14 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 10 by Appellee Banner Health received. [Entered: 08/12/2025 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 13 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellee Banner Health received. [Entered: 08/12/2025 11:16 AM] |
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellee Banner Health is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 10 by Appellee Banner Health are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/07/2025 11:23 AM]
|
| Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Banner Health. [Entered: 08/07/2025 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 10 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Banner Health. [Entered: 08/07/2025 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 9 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Banner Health. [Entered: 08/07/2025 09:08 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/8/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/07/2025 03:55 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Banner Health. [Entered: 07/07/2025 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Kelley M. Jancaitis [Entered: 07/07/2025 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kelley M. Jancaitis for Appellee Banner Health. [Entered: 07/07/2025 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant John Clayton Harvey is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 05/07/2025 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant John Clayton Harvey. [Entered: 05/06/2025 05:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/9/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/9/2025. For appeal no. 25-2783, 2:25-cv-00592-KML. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/30/2025 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00592-KML has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2783 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/30/2025 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Harvey v. Banner Health | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN CLAYTON HARVEY | |
| Represented By: | John Clayton Harvey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BANNER HEALTH | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Danielle Nicole Chronister |
| Represented By: | Robert Thomas Sullivan |
| Represented By: | Kelley M. Jancaitis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
