Lear v. Navarro, et al.
Plaintiff: RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR
Defendant: Sgt J. NAVARRO, LIMON, ALLISON, HERRICK, NEVE, VILLADOLID and PLATA, Correctional Officer at California State Prison-Corcoran
Case Number: 25-2912
Filed: May 6, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2025 Filing 24 CLERK ACTION: Reply Brief submitted at DE 23 by Appellant Roderick William Lear is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 10/24/2025 12:04 PM]
October 24, 2025 Filing 23 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Roderick William Lear. [Entered: 10/24/2025 12:04 PM]
October 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 21) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 10/21/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/22/2025 02:50 PM]
October 21, 2025 Filing 21 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant Roderick William Lear. [Entered: 10/21/2025 03:17 PM]
September 16, 2025 Filing 20 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 17 by Appellees is received. [Entered: 09/16/2025 03:50 PM]
September 16, 2025 Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 16 by Appellees received. [Entered: 09/16/2025 03:44 PM]
September 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 16 by Appellees is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 17 by Appellees are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellees must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/12/2025 05:48 PM]
September 11, 2025 Filing 17 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee J. Navarro, Appellee Allison, Appellee Neve. [Entered: 09/11/2025 01:20 PM]
September 11, 2025 Filing 16 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee J. Navarro, Appellee Allison, Appellee Neve. [Entered: 09/11/2025 01:16 PM]
July 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/11/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/30/2025 02:07 PM]
July 30, 2025 Filing 14 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee J. Navarro, Appellee Allison, Appellee Neve. [Entered: 07/30/2025 11:56 AM]
July 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Appellant has paid the fees for this appeal. Therefore, the May 12, 2025 order is vacated and the motion (Docket Entry No. 6) to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied as unnecessary. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The clerk will file the opening brief submitted on July 7, 2025. The answering brief is due August 12, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 07/11/2025 04:27 PM]
July 8, 2025 Filing 12 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 07/08/2025 10:45 AM]
July 8, 2025 Filing 11 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellant Roderick William Lear is filed. Original and 0 copies. (briefing remains stayed, motion for IFP pending.) [Entered: 07/08/2025 10:17 AM]
July 7, 2025 Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Roderick William Lear. [Entered: 07/08/2025 10:15 AM]
June 23, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Roderick William Lear. [Entered: 06/24/2025 02:24 PM]
June 23, 2025 Filing 8 Received PLRA Authorization filed by Appellant Roderick William Lear. [Entered: 06/24/2025 02:22 PM]
June 2, 2025 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Roderick William Lear. [Entered: 06/02/2025 04:40 PM]
June 2, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Roderick William Lear. [Entered: 06/02/2025 04:35 PM]
May 28, 2025 Filing 5 Attorney George R. Morris as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney Jon S. Allin. [Entered: 05/28/2025 02:08 PM]
May 28, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by George R. Morris for Appellee Allison, Appellee J. Navarro, Appellee Neve replacing Jon S. Allin. [Entered: 05/28/2025 01:56 PM]
May 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 05/12/2025 09:40 AM]
May 6, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/16/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/15/2025. For appeal no. 25-2912, 1:21-cv-00600-KES-BAM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/06/2025 12:06 PM]
May 6, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:21-cv-00600-KES-BAM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2912 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/06/2025 12:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lear v. Navarro, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR
Represented By: Roderick William Lear
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt J. NAVARRO
Represented By: Jon S. Allin
Represented By: George R. Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LIMON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALLISON
Represented By: Jon S. Allin
Represented By: George R. Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HERRICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEVE
Represented By: Jon S. Allin
Represented By: George R. Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VILLADOLID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PLATA, Correctional Officer at California State Prison-Corcoran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?