Lyles v. Sherman
| SCOTT ALLEN LYLES |
| STU SHERMAN |
| 25-2969 |
| May 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due December 29, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 10/29/2025 08:22 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Stu Sherman. [Entered: 10/23/2025 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 15 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles received. [Entered: 10/02/2025 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 14 CLERK ACTION: Excerpts of Record in 14 Volumes submitted at DE 11 by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 10/01/2025 11:59 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles is filed. Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be addressed to the Clerks principal office and mailed or transmitted to a delivery service within 7 days of this order. [Entered: 10/01/2025 11:55 AM]
|
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles. [Entered: 09/30/2025 10:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles. [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 30, 2025. The answering brief is due October 30, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 09/25/2025 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles. [Entered: 09/23/2025 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 23, 2025. The answering brief is due October 23, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 08/29/2025 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles. [Entered: 08/26/2025 03:38 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. (TEXT ONLY) The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 2, 2025. The answering brief is due October 2, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/16/2025 08:57 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles. [Entered: 07/10/2025 04:06 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 3) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/17/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/18/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/17/2025 10:56 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Scott Allen Lyles. [Entered: 06/17/2025 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/17/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/17/2025. For appeal no. 25-2969, 2:20-cv-09078-FWS-MAR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/08/2025 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:20-cv-09078-FWS-MAR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2969 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/08/2025 10:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lyles v. Sherman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SCOTT ALLEN LYLES | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Michael T Drake |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: STU SHERMAN | |
| Represented By: | Julie Ann Harris |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jonathan Matthew Krauss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.