Johnson, et al. v. GigSmart, Inc.
Petitioner: GIGSMART, INC.
Respondent: SUSAN JOHNSON and CHRISTI MCCRACKEN, individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Case Number: 25-3042
Filed: May 12, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Lawrence VANDYKE). The petition for permission to appeal is denied. See 28 U.S.C. 1453(c); Coleman v. Estes Express Lines, Inc., 627 F.3d 1096, 1100 (9th Cir. 2010) (describing factors this court considers in analyzing a CAFA petition). [Entered: 07/22/2025 02:30 PM]
May 23, 2025 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner GigSmart, Inc.. [Entered: 05/23/2025 01:13 PM]
May 12, 2025 Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for Permission to Appeal. [Entered: 05/12/2025 01:46 PM]
May 12, 2025 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/9/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3042 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 05/12/2025 01:44 PM]
May 9, 2025 Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1453(c) filed by Petitioner GigSmart, Inc.. [Entered: 05/12/2025 01:43 PM]
May 9, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1453(c) filed by Petitioner GigSmart, Inc.. [Entered: 05/12/2025 01:43 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Johnson, et al. v. GigSmart, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUSAN JOHNSON
Represented By: Mr. Craig Nicholas
Represented By: Shaun Markley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHRISTI MCCRACKEN, individual, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Represented By: Mr. Craig Nicholas
Represented By: Shaun Markley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GIGSMART, INC.
Represented By: Mr. Alexander Larsen Nowinski
Represented By: Ashley Boulton
Represented By: Timothy J. Long
Represented By: Sam Hyde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?