King v. Matterson
| CLINTON DOUGLAS KING |
| G. MATTERSON, Warden |
| 25-3052 |
| May 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Clinton Douglas King. [Entered: 05/23/2025 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 CASE TRANSFERRED. To USDC Central District of California, Los Angeles - Per Order Filed 5/19/2025 - The District Court was noitifed via NDA. [Entered: 05/19/2025 05:46 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Clinton Douglas King has filed a 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas petition relating to Kings Los Angeles County Superior Court conviction for assault with a deadly weapon in Case No. BA218376. When a habeas petition is filed in the court of appeals, the application must be transferred to the appropriate district court. Fed. R. App. P. 22(a); see 28 U.S.C. 1631, 2241(b). The clerk will transfer the petition at Docket Entry No. 1 to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, for whatever consideration that court deems appropriate. The petition is deemed filed on March 26, 2025, the date it was signed. See Butler v. Long, 752 F.3d 1177, 1178 n.1 (9th Cir. 2014) (assuming petitioner turned petition over to prison authorities on the day it was signed and applying the mailbox rule). This transfer order is issued without regard to whether petitioners claims have any merit or satisfy the procedural requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2244(d) and 2254. The clerk will include a copy of this order with the transferred petition. Upon transfer of the petition, the clerk will close this original action. PETITION TRANSFERRED to the district court. [COURT UPDATE: Attached Petition. NDA re-sent] [Entered: 05/19/2025 03:35 PM] [Edited: 05/19/2025 04:02 PM]
|
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Original Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. [Entered: 05/12/2025 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/30/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3052 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 05/12/2025 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Clinton Douglas King. [Entered: 05/12/2025 02:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: King v. Matterson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CLINTON DOUGLAS KING | |
| Represented By: | Clinton Douglas King |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: G. MATTERSON, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
