United States of America v. Rodriguez
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JONATHAN JAMES RODRIGUEZ |
| 25-3066 |
| May 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. 3) is denied as moot because, as appellee concedes, this court has jurisdiction over the district courts final garnishment order in No. 1:24-MC-00085. Appellate proceedings are stayed pending the district courts final garnishment order in No. 1:24-MC-0021, or further order of this court. Within 7 days after the district courts final order in No. 1:24-MC-0021, appellee must file a status report or an appropriate motion. [Entered: 07/29/2025 09:15 AM]
|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 8) filed by . [Entered: 06/24/2025 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 8) filed by Appellant Jonathan James Rodriguez. [Entered: 06/24/2025 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 8) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 06/18/2025 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 3) filed by Appellant Jonathan James Rodriguez. [Entered: 06/13/2025 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 Criminal Appeals Questionnaire filed by Appellant Jonathan James Rodriguez [Entered: 06/04/2025 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 Attorney John Paul Balazs as Counsel for Appellant substituted for Attorney Harry M. Drandell. [Entered: 05/29/2025 02:09 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) by Harry M. Drandell to withdraw and to appoint new counsel is granted. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A. The clerk will terminate counsel Drandell from the docket and add counsel John Balazs, 916 Second St., Suite F, Sacramento CA 95814, (916) 447-9299, [email protected], who has agreed to accept appointment. The response to the motion to dismiss is due June 13, 2025. Any reply is due June 20, 2025. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11(a)(1). The clerk will serve this order on former counsel, new counsel, and appellant individually. [Entered: 05/29/2025 02:04 PM] [Edited: 05/29/2025 02:13 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw and for Appointment of New Counsel filed by Appellant Jonathan James Rodriguez. [Entered: 05/20/2025 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/20/2025 07:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: N/A. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 5/27/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 6/25/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 8/4/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/3/2025. For appeal no. 25-3066, 1:20-cr-00122-JLT-SKO-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 05/13/2025 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:20-cr-00122-JLT-SKO-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3066 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/13/2025 10:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Robin Tubesing |
| Represented By: | Joseph Barton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JONATHAN JAMES RODRIGUEZ | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Harry M. Drandell |
| Represented By: | Mr. John Paul Balazs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
