Cody v. Young, et al.
Plaintiff: GRAHAM CODY, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AXT, INC.
Defendant: MORRIS S. YOUNG, GARY L. FISCHER, DAVID C. CHANG, JESSE CHEN, CHRISTINE RUSSELL, LEONARD J. LEBLANC and AXT, INC., Nominal Defendant
Case Number: 25-3112
Filed: May 14, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2025 Filing 15 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 11/13/2025, 2:00 pm Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 12/15/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 1/14/2026, Optional Reply Brief (Appellant) due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/02/2025 04:24 PM]
September 23, 2025 Filing 14 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 10/2/2025, 2:00 PM Pacific Time (originally 9/23/2025). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [Entered: 09/23/2025 11:10 AM]
August 20, 2025 Filing 13 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 9/23/2025, 10:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 10/27/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 11/26/2025, Optional reply brief due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/20/2025 11:41 AM]
July 7, 2025 Filing 12 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 8/20/2025, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/8/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/8/2025, Optional Reply Brief (Appellant) due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/07/2025 01:05 PM]
June 16, 2025 Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 7/7/2025, 11:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 8/6/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/5/2025, Optional reply brief due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/16/2025 02:45 PM]
May 28, 2025 Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Morris S. Young, Appellee Gary L. Fischer, Appellee David C. Chang, Appellee Jesse Chen, Appellee Christine Russell, Appellee Leonard J. LeBlanc, Appellee AXT, Inc.. [Entered: 05/28/2025 01:33 PM]
May 27, 2025 Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Philip C. Babler [Entered: 05/27/2025 03:04 PM]
May 27, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Philip C. Babler for Appellant Graham Cody. [Entered: 05/27/2025 06:44 AM]
May 22, 2025 Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 6/16/2025, 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time (originally 06/02/2025). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [Entered: 05/22/2025 10:12 AM]
May 21, 2025 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 6/2/2025, 2:00 p.m. Pacific Time (originally 06/04/2025). Each participant will receive an email modifying the dial-in information. [Entered: 05/21/2025 04:00 PM]
May 20, 2025 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 6/4/2025, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:31 PM]
May 19, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellee Morris S. Young, Appellee Gary L. Fischer, Appellee David C. Chang, Appellee Jesse Chen, Appellee Christine Russell, Appellee Leonard J. LeBlanc, Appellee AXT, Inc.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 05/19/2025 11:53 AM]
May 19, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by . To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 05/19/2025 10:44 AM]
May 14, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 5/19/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/23/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/23/2025. For appeal no. 25-3112, 3:24-cv-05683-MMC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/14/2025 05:08 PM]
May 14, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-05683-MMC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3112 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/14/2025 05:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cody v. Young, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GRAHAM CODY, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant AXT, INC.
Represented By: Benjamin Isaac Sachs-Michaels
Represented By: Pavithra Rajesh
Represented By: Mr. Philip C. Babler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MORRIS S. YOUNG
Represented By: Mia Tsui
Represented By: Eunice Leong
Represented By: Doru Gavril
Represented By: Boris Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GARY L. FISCHER
Represented By: Mia Tsui
Represented By: Eunice Leong
Represented By: Doru Gavril
Represented By: Boris Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID C. CHANG
Represented By: Mia Tsui
Represented By: Eunice Leong
Represented By: Doru Gavril
Represented By: Boris Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JESSE CHEN
Represented By: Mia Tsui
Represented By: Eunice Leong
Represented By: Doru Gavril
Represented By: Boris Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTINE RUSSELL
Represented By: Mia Tsui
Represented By: Eunice Leong
Represented By: Doru Gavril
Represented By: Boris Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LEONARD J. LEBLANC
Represented By: Mia Tsui
Represented By: Eunice Leong
Represented By: Doru Gavril
Represented By: Boris Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AXT, INC., Nominal Defendant
Represented By: Mia Tsui
Represented By: Eunice Leong
Represented By: Doru Gavril
Represented By: Boris Feldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?