Rezanezhad Gatabi v. Target Corporation, et al.
| IMAN REZANEZHAD GATABI |
| TARGET CORPORATION, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT CALIFF, COMMISSIONER, U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, in his official capacity as Commissioner, United States Food and Drug Administration, TRADER JOE'S COMPANY, SAFEWAY, INC., NATURAL GROCERS and VITAMIN COTTAGE NATURAL FOOD MARKETS, INC. |
| 25-316 |
| January 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| REZANEZHAD GATABI V. TARGET CORPORATION, ET AL. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 02/11/2025 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 2/10/2025, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 01/29/2025 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Iman Rezanezhad Gatabi. [Entered: 01/22/2025 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Iman Rezanezhad Gatabi. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 01/22/2025 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Iman Rezanezhad Gatabi [Entered: 01/22/2025 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Iman Rezanezhad Gatabi for Appellant Iman Rezanezhad Gatabi. [Entered: 01/16/2025 08:08 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/21/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 1/22/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 2/21/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/2/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/2/2025. For appeal no. 25-316, 3:24-cv-02398-LB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/16/2025 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-02398-LB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-316 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/16/2025 03:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
