Marks v. Walmart Supercenter #2113
| CHESTER LEE MARKS |
| WALMART SUPERCENTER #2113 |
| 25-32 |
| January 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 02/28/2025 04:15 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Chester Lee Marks. [Entered: 02/26/2025 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Chester Lee Marks. [Entered: 02/19/2025 08:31 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Chester Lee Marks. [Entered: 02/19/2025 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Chester Lee Marks is filed. Original and 6 copies. (motion for IFP and appoitment of counsel pending, briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 02/14/2025 12:58 PM] [Edited: 02/14/2025 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Chester Lee Marks. [Entered: 02/14/2025 12:55 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. The fees for this appeal are overdue. Within 21 days, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will stay the briefing schedule. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. The clerk will serve Form 4 on appellant. [Entered: 01/28/2025 09:05 AM]
|
| Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Lawrence J. Sorohan [Entered: 01/17/2025 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Walmart Supercenter #2113. [Entered: 01/17/2025 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lawrence J. Sorohan for Appellee Walmart Supercenter #2113. [Entered: 01/17/2025 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/12/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/14/2025. For appeal no. 25-32, 2:24-cv-00381-KML. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/03/2025 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-00381-KML has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-32 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/03/2025 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marks v. Walmart Supercenter #2113 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WALMART SUPERCENTER #2113 | |
| Represented By: | Pavneet Singh Uppal |
| Represented By: | Jacob Valdez |
| Represented By: | Lawrence J. Sorohan, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHESTER LEE MARKS | |
| Represented By: | Chester Lee Marks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
