Neaman v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER NEAMAN
Defendant: WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TERRA AMBROSE, DAVID ARCURI, ELISA SAHORE and DAVID HATCH
Case Number: 25-3254
Filed: May 21, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 28, 2026 NEAMAN V. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.Tacoma, Western WashingtonCivilHawkins, Michael Daly, McKeown, M. Margaret, Christen, Morgan

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2025 Filing 21 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Washington Department of Corrections, Appellee Terra Ambrose, Appellee Elisa Sahore. [Court entered filing to correct DE 20] [Entered: 11/14/2025 04:08 PM]
November 14, 2025 Filing 20 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer filed by Appellee Washington Department of Corrections, Appellee Terra Ambrose, Appellee Elisa Sahore. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 21] [Entered: 11/14/2025 03:55 PM] [Edited: 11/14/2025 04:09 PM]
November 5, 2025 Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Appellant Christopher Neaman received. [Entered: 11/05/2025 04:14 PM]
October 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Appellant Christopher Neaman is filed. Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be addressed to the Clerks principal office and mailed or transmitted to a delivery service within 7 days of this order. [Entered: 10/22/2025 01:32 PM]
October 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry Nos. 12 & 13) for leave to file a replacement opening brief is granted. The clerk will strike the opening brief at Docket Entry No. 9 and file the replacement opening brief at Docket Entry No. 14. The answering brief remains due November 28, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 10/22/2025 09:19 AM]
October 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 15) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 11/28/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/15/2025 10:31 AM]
October 14, 2025 Filing 15 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Washington Department of Corrections, Appellee Terra Ambrose, Appellee Elisa Sahore. [Entered: 10/14/2025 04:33 PM]
October 10, 2025 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Christopher Neaman. [Entered: 10/10/2025 03:30 PM]
October 8, 2025 Filing 13 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to File Replacement Brief (DE 12) filed by Appellant Christopher Neaman. [Entered: 10/08/2025 08:30 PM]
October 8, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION to File Replacement Brief filed by Appellant Christopher Neaman.--[COURT UPDATE: removed PDF of brief, re-submitted correctly in DE 14] [Entered: 10/08/2025 08:14 PM] [Edited: 10/10/2025 03:51 PM]
October 1, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Appellant Christopher Neaman is filed. Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be addressed to the Clerks principal office and mailed or transmitted to a delivery service within 7 days of this order. The Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 10 by Appellant Christopher Neaman are filed. No paper copies of the excerpts are required at this time. [Entered: 10/01/2025 03:02 PM]
September 29, 2025 Filing 10 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Christopher Neaman. [Entered: 09/29/2025 10:33 PM]
September 29, 2025 Filing 9 STRICKEN PER ORDER (DE 17): OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Christopher Neaman.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 10/1/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 09/29/2025 10:32 PM] [Edited: 10/22/2025 09:20 AM]
July 30, 2025 Filing 8 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 29, 2025. The answering brief is due October 29, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 07/30/2025 10:29 AM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Christopher Neaman. [Entered: 07/28/2025 12:08 PM]
June 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 5) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/30/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/29/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/26/2025 02:40 PM]
June 26, 2025 Filing 5 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Christopher Neaman. [Entered: 06/26/2025 07:01 AM]
June 4, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER (text only). This case is released from the court's mediation program. Counsel may contact the Circuit Mediation Office at [email protected] to discuss services available through the Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Information regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 06/04/2025 12:14 PM]
May 28, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 6/2/2025. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 05/28/2025 01:43 PM]
May 21, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 5/27/2025, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/30/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/30/2025. For appeal no. 25-3254, 3:24-cv-05176-BHS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/21/2025 03:01 PM]
May 21, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-05176-BHS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3254 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/21/2025 02:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Neaman v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER NEAMAN
Represented By: Mr. James Dixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Hannah Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERRA AMBROSE
Represented By: Hannah Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID ARCURI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELISA SAHORE
Represented By: Hannah Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID HATCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?