United States of America v. Schoepflin
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| SEAN SCHOEPFLIN, Sean Fitzgerald and Sean Schoepflin II |
| 25-3384 |
| May 28, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 34
ORDER FILED. The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 68) to withdraw the motion for bail pending appeal is granted. The motion for bail pending appeal at Docket Entry No. 56 is deemed withdrawn. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The consolidated answering brief is due December 26, 2025. The optional consolidated reply brief is due within 21 days after the answering brief is served. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 10/01/2025 11:21 AM]
|
| Filing 33 MOTION to Withdraw Party Filing filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 10/01/2025 07:24 AM] |
Filing 32
ORDER FILED. The district court has denied the motion for bail pending appeal. Appellant may supplement the motion for bail pending appeal filed in this court (Docket Entry No. 56) by September 30, 2025. The response to the motion is due October 10, 2025. The optional reply is due within 7 days after service of the response. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 09/23/2025 09:28 AM]
|
| Filing 31 District Court Order/Notice Received. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 09/22/2025 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 30 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [Court entered filing to correct DE 64] [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 09/12/2025 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 29 DEFECTIVE --- STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [Wrong filing type used, corrected in DE 65] [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 09/12/2025 02:02 PM] [Edited: 09/12/2025 02:08 PM] |
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT The petition (Docket Entry No. 56) for writ of mandamus is denied. The request for bail pending appeal (contained in Docket Entry No. 56) is held in abeyance. This appeal is remanded for the district court to issue a decision on the motion for bail pending appeal filed on February 24, 2025. See 18 U.S.C. 3143(b); Fed. R. App. P. 9(b); see also United States v. Wheeler, 795 F.2d 839, 841 (9th Cir. 1986) (order). The district court is requested to provide a decision within 14 days. The clerk will serve this order on the district judge. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/28/2025 04:10 PM]
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 61) for an extension of time to file the consolidated answering brief is granted. The consolidated answering brief is due December 26, 2025. The optional consolidated reply brief is due within 21 days after the answering brief is served. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/26/2025 01:41 PM]
|
| Filing 26 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellee United States of America. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/19/2025 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 25 ADDED [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Solomon Dong Kim for Appellee United States of America. [23-4317, 23-4311, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Solomon Dong Kim for Appellee United States of America. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/06/2025 06:33 PM] |
| Filing 21 MOTION for Bail Pending Appeal (Fed. R. App. P. 9(b)) filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/06/2025 06:16 PM] |
| Filing 20 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Appellant Sean Schoepflin received. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/06/2025 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 19 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 7 Volumes (Vol 7 UNDER SEAL) and Index Volume submitted at DE 47, 51 by Appellant Sean Schoepflin are received. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 08/06/2025 11:07 AM] |
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Appellant Sean Schoepflin is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 47, 51 in No. 23-4311 by Appellant Sean Schoepflin are filed. Volume 7 is filed UNDER SEAL. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/29/2025 04:03 PM]
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 48) to file under seal Volume 7 of the excerpts of record is granted. The clerk will file publicly the motion to seal and certificate of service (Docket Entry Nos. 48.1 and 48.3), opening brief (Docket Entry No. 50), and Volumes 1 to 6 of the excerpts of record (Docket Entry No. 47). The clerk will maintain under seal Volume 7 of the excerpts of record (Docket Entry No. 51). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/29/2025 03:23 PM]
|
| Filing 16 EXCERPTS OF RECORD Volume 7 UNDER SEAL submitted for filing by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] (Court entered filing of sealed vol submitted at DE 48 in No. 23-4311) [Entered: 07/29/2025 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 15 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/28/2025 09:50 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [COURT UPDATE: UNSEALED DE 48.1 AND 48.3 PER DE 52] [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/28/2025 02:18 PM] [Edited: 07/29/2025 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 13 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/28/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 12 Presentence Report UNDER SEAL filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/28/2025 02:22 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 45) for an extension of time to file the consolidated opening brief is granted. The consolidated opening brief is due July 28, 2025. The consolidated answering brief is due August 27, 2025. The optional consolidated reply brief is due 21 days after the consolidated answering brief is served. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/22/2025 10:50 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/21/2025 12:02 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 42) for an extension of time to file the consolidated opening brief is granted. The consolidated opening brief is due July 21, 2025. The consolidated answering brief is due August 20, 2025. The optional consolidated reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 07/01/2025 09:47 AM]
|
| Filing 8 SUBSTITUTED Chief, Criminal Appeals, US Attorneys Office, CDCA, for David Friedman. [Entered: 06/30/2025 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 06/26/2025 07:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Alexander Su, representing Appellee United States of America. [25-3384, 23-4311, 23-4317] [Entered: 06/06/2025 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Alexander Su. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [25-3384, 23-4311, 23-4317] [Entered: 06/06/2025 01:46 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. The unopposed motion to consolidate (Docket Entry No. 37 in No. 23-4311; Docket Entry No. 39 in No. 23-4317; Docket Entry No. 3 in No. 25-3384) is granted. Appeal Nos. 23-4311, 23-4317 and 25-3384 are consolidated. The parties must include all case numbers on future filings. The existing briefing schedule in Appeal No. 23-4311 will govern these consolidated appeals. [23-4311, 23-4317, 25-3384] [Entered: 06/06/2025 10:02 AM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Consolidate filed by Appellant Sean Schoepflin. [Entered: 05/29/2025 06:24 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: N/A. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 7/7/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 8/6/2025. For appeal no. 25-3384, 2:22-cr-00374-FMO-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 05/28/2025 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cr-00374-FMO-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3384 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/28/2025 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.