Dalavai v. Calac, et al.
| RANDAL JEROME DALAVAI |
| DANIEL CALAC, Dr. , M.D. an individual, LAURENCE H. BOGGELN, Dr, M.D., an individual, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES OF RANCHO SPRINGS, INC., DBA: Inland Valley Medical Center; DBA: Southwest Healthcare System, DONNA LOZA, official capacity, DEO BESANA, official capacity, KAREN YVONNE DALAVAI, nominal defendant, JANE SHERIL DALAVAI, nominal defendant and EMIL JASON DALAVAI, nominal defendant |
| 25-3495 |
| June 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| DALAVAI V. CALAC, ET AL.San Diego, Southern CaliforniaCivilWardlaw, Kim McLane, Bade, Bridget S., Johnstone, Anthony D. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 10) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 11) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 26) granted. Amended briefing schedule FOR ALL APPELLEES: Consolidated Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/31/2025. Optional Consolidated Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Consolidated Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. The court prefers joint briefs where possible. See Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Ninth Circuit Rule 32-2. [25-2109, 25-3495, 25-3830] [Entered: 11/14/2025 09:58 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Daniel Calac, Appellee Laurence H. Boggeln. [25-2109, 25-3495, 25-3830] [Entered: 11/13/2025 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Randal Jerome Dalavai is filed. No paper copies are required. [25-2109, 25-3495, 25-3830] [Entered: 10/31/2025 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Randal Jerome Dalavai. [25-3830, 25-2109, 25-3495] [Entered: 10/30/2025 11:55 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 22) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Consolidated Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 10/30/2025, Consolidated Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/1/2025. Optional Consolidated Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Consolidated Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. The court prefers joint briefs where possible. See Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Ninth Circuit Rule 32-2. [25-2109, 25-3495, 25-3830] [Entered: 10/01/2025 11:26 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Randal Jerome Dalavai. [25-3830, 25-2109, 25-3495] [Entered: 09/30/2025 11:58 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Sidney R. THOMAS, Mark J. BENNETT On June 13, 2025, the district court entered a final judgment. The June 6, 2025 order to show cause in appeal No. 25-2109 is therefore discharged. Appeal No. 25-2109 proceeds as an appeal from the January 29, 2025 dismissal order. See Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. City of Adelanto, 87 F.3d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1996) (premature appeal from district courts dismissal order cured by dismissal of remaining parties); see also Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 630 F.2d 677, 680-81 (9th Cir. 1980). The entry of a final judgment renders moot the portion of appeal No. 25-2109 that challenged the district courts denial of preliminary injunctive relief. See SEC v. Mount Vernon Meml Park, 664 F.2d 1358, 1361 (9th Cir. 1982) (when district court enters final judgment, appeal from preliminary injunction becomes moot). The court consolidates Appeal Nos. 25-2109, 25-3495, and 25-3830. The consolidated opening brief is due September 30, 2025. The consolidated answering brief is due October 30, 2025. The optional consolidated reply brief is due 21 days after the consolidated answering brief is served. The court prefers joint briefs where possible. See Circuit Advisory Committee Note to Ninth Circuit Rule 32-2. [25-2109, 25-3495, 25-3830] [Entered: 09/02/2025 10:29 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 3) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/8/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/8/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/30/2025 11:31 AM]
|
| Filing 3 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Randal Jerome Dalavai. [Entered: 07/30/2025 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 6/10/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 7/9/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 8/8/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 9/8/2025. For appeal no. 25-3495, 3:22-cv-01471-CAB-DDL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/03/2025 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:22-cv-01471-CAB-DDL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3495 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/03/2025 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
