Aire v. AOE Law & Associates, APC, et al.
| EJEME JOYCE AIRE |
| AOE LAW & ASSOCIATES, APC, DAVID INGRAM, TATYANA BETS, Individual Capacity as Clerk of Los Angeles Superior Court: Official Capacity as Clerk of Los Angeles Superior Court, LINDA COMSTOCK, Individual Capacity as Clerk of Los Angeles Superior Court: Official Capacity as Clerk of Los Angeles Superior Court, GEORGE CORONA, Individual Capacity as Chief Trial Counsel of State Bar of California: Official Capacity as Chief Trial Counsel of State Bar of California, ANTHONY O. EGBASE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, YELENA KAMINSKY, CPA, MICHAEL KRYCLER, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, A governmental entity, DOE, Defendants 1 through 10, inclusive, Judge ALICIA BLANCO, Individual Capacity as Judge of Los Angeles Superior Court: Official Capacity as Judge of Los Angeles Superior Court, DAVID INGRAM LAW, APC and KRYCLER ERVIN TAUBMAN & KAMINSKY, CPA |
| 25-3599 |
| June 6, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Proceedings in this court other than mediation are stayed until the district court rules on the timely tolling motions filed in the district court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). To challenge the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file a timely notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) to stay briefing is unnecessary. Briefing will be reset after the stay of proceedings is lifted, and the court decides appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11(a)(4). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district judge. [Entered: 07/01/2025 10:14 AM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Ejeme Joyce Aire. [Entered: 06/24/2025 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Appellant Ejeme Joyce Aire. [Entered: 06/24/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Ejeme Joyce Aire. [Entered: 06/17/2025 08:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Ejeme Joyce Aire. [Entered: 06/13/2025 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 7/16/2025. For appeal no. 25-3599, 2:25-cv-03980-SVW-KS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/06/2025 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-03980-SVW-KS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3599 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/06/2025 02:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
