Fox v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana
| MARCELLA FOX |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA |
| PATHWAYS OF HOPE |
| 25-3644 |
| June 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. (Kim McLane WARDLAW, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ, Anthony D. JOHNSTONE) After considering the mandamus petition, answer, and reply, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). The petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [Entered: 07/17/2025 04:38 PM]
|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Answer (DE 11) filed by Petitioner Marcella Fox. [Entered: 07/15/2025 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition (DE 1) filed by Real Party in Interest Pathways of Hope. [Court entered filing to correct DE 9] [Entered: 07/02/2025 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Pathways of Hope. [Entered: 07/01/2025 07:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE---ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Real Party in Interest Pathways of Hope. [Wrong filing type, corrected in DE 11] [Entered: 07/01/2025 05:52 PM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 12:38 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Kim McLane WARDLAW, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ, Anthony D. JOHNSTONE Real party in interest must file an answer to this petition for a writ of mandamus within 14 days. See Fed. R. App. P. 21(b). The district court may also address the petition if it so desires. If the district court elects to address the petition, it may file an answer with this court or issue a supplemental order and serve a copy on this court. Petitioner may file a reply within 7 days after service of the answer(s). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district court and District Judge John W. Holcomb. [Entered: 06/17/2025 03:06 PM]
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Marcella Fox. [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Injunctive Relief filed by Petitioner Marcella Fox. [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:28 PM] [Edited: 06/10/2025 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Petitioner Marcella Fox. [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:27 PM] [Edited: 06/10/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Accept Oversized Document Other than a Brief filed by Petitioner Marcella Fox. [Entered: 06/10/2025 04:24 PM] [Edited: 06/10/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 06/09/2025 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 6/9/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3644 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 06/09/2025 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Marcella Fox. [Entered: 06/09/2025 04:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fox v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MARCELLA FOX | |
| Represented By: | Marcella Fox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: PATHWAYS OF HOPE | |
| Represented By: | Josh Wolff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
