United States of America v. Holmes
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| RANDY COY JAMES HOLMES |
| 25-3815 |
| June 17, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY. The judgment of this Court, entered 11/20/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 12/12/2025 09:58 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY) The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) to dismiss this appeal as untimely is granted. The appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 941-42 (9th Cir. 2007). DISMISSED. [Entered: 11/20/2025 02:26 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Presentence Report UNDER SEAL filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 10/16/2025 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 10/16/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Summary Disposition or to Dismiss filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 10/16/2025 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 09/18/2025 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Randy Coy James Holmes is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 09/15/2025 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Randy Coy James Holmes. [Entered: 09/15/2025 03:29 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. This courts docket reflects that appellant is proceeding without counsel. Accordingly, appellant is responsible for preparing a pro se brief stating, in appellants own words, why appellant believes the district courts decision was incorrect. The pro se opening brief is due September 15, 2025. The answering brief is due October 15, 2025. The optional pro se reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Appellant is not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellant does not submit excerpts, appellee must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. If appellant does not file a timely pro se opening brief, the appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/31/2025 01:16 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: N/A. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 7/28/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 8/26/2025. For appeal no. 25-3815, 2:21-cr-00164-TOR-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 06/17/2025 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cr-00164-TOR-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3815 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/17/2025 03:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Holmes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Ian L. Garriques |
| Represented By: | Ms. Caitlin Ann Baunsgard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RANDY COY JAMES HOLMES | |
| Represented By: | Randy Coy James Holmes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
