Fierro v. Schuyler
| DAVID REY FIERRO |
| CHARLES SCHUYLER, Acting Warden at Salinas Valley State Prison |
| 25-3827 |
| June 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Criminal Appeals Questionnaire filed by Appellant David Rey Fierro [Entered: 11/16/2025 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 8 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. Please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to determine if this order applies to your deadlines. [Entered: 11/13/2025 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant David Rey Fierro. [Entered: 10/28/2025 09:48 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for a second extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (COA) is granted. Any request for a COA is due by October 22, 2025. [Entered: 09/19/2025 02:12 PM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant David Rey Fierro. [Entered: 09/17/2025 10:41 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 3) for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (COA) is granted. Any request for a COA is due by September 22, 2025. [Entered: 07/16/2025 01:54 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant David Rey Fierro. [Entered: 07/15/2025 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: [06/10/2025]. [Entered: 06/18/2025 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-09180-GW-DTB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3827 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/18/2025 01:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fierro v. Schuyler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DAVID REY FIERRO | |
| Represented By: | Mr. James Scott Thomson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CHARLES SCHUYLER, Acting Warden at Salinas Valley State Prison | |
| Represented By: | Amanda Lloyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
