Early Warning Services, LLC v. Johnson, et al.
| BRANDON O'LOUGHLIN and P.A.Z.E. LLC |
| EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC and WARREN JOHNSON |
| SARA STADLER |
| 25-3838 |
| June 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 MANDATE ISSUED Holly A. THOMAS, Ana DE ALBA, Jed S. Rakoff [Entered: 07/24/2025 09:18 AM] |
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Holly A. THOMAS, Ana DE ALBA, Jed S. Rakoff The motion to seal, Dkt No. 15, is granted. The clerk will file publicly the motion to seal, Dkt No. 15.1. The clerk will maintain under seal Dkt. Nos. 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12.2, and 15.2. [Entered: 07/03/2025 05:16 PM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC.--[Court entered filing due to technical issues with ACMS]--[COURT UPDATE: Unsealed DE 15.1 per order at DE 16] [Entered: 07/03/2025 02:05 PM] [Edited: 07/03/2025 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 14 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC.--[Court entered filing due to technical issue with ACMS] [Entered: 07/03/2025 02:01 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. (Holly A. THOMAS, Ana DE ALBA, Jed S. Rakoff). This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the June 16, 2025 notice of appeal does not challenge a final or immediately appealable order entered by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; United States v. Washington, 573 F.2d 1121, 1122 (9th Cir. 1978) (order denying motion to disqualify judge is not final or appealable). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) to seal is granted. The clerk will file publicly the motion to seal (Docket Entry No. 12.1). The clerk will maintain under seal Docket Entry Nos. 3, 4, 7, 8, and 12.2. The motion (Docket Entry Nos. 4 and 8) to stay the district courts June 26, 2025 order is denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 07/02/2025 06:04 PM]
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing (DE 10) filed by Appellant Warren Johnson.--[Locked pending motion] [Entered: 07/02/2025 03:46 AM] [Edited: 07/03/2025 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Maintain Document Under Seal filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC.--[Court entered filing to correct DE 10] [COURT UPDATE: unsealed DE 12.1 per order at DE 13] [Entered: 07/02/2025 08:39 AM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 06:05 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to File Document Under Seal and Sealed Document Submitted for Filing filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC.--[Wrong filing type, correct DE is 12] [Entered: 07/01/2025 07:59 PM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 9 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC. [Entered: 07/01/2025 07:48 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Appellant Warren Johnson.[COURT ENTERED-Filing from DE#07]--[Locked pending motion] [Entered: 07/01/2025 04:43 PM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 7 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Warren Johnson.--[Locked pending motion] [Entered: 07/01/2025 04:07 PM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant Warren Johnson. [COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF.] [Entered: 07/01/2025 04:05 PM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Early Warning Services, LLC. [Entered: 07/01/2025 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Appellant Warren Johnson. [COURT ENTERED FILING to refile motion in DE 3.]--[Locked pending motion] [Entered: 06/30/2025 07:56 AM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 3 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Warren Johnson. [COURT UPDATE: Removed motion and refiled at DE 4.]--[Locked pending motion] [Entered: 06/30/2025 06:37 AM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 6/30/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 7/30/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/8/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/8/2025. For appeal no. 25-3838, 2:24-cv-01587-SMB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/18/2025 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-01587-SMB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3838 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/18/2025 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
