Haar v. Mattos, et al.
| JEREMY MARTIN HAAR |
| COLETTE S. PETERS, Director of Bureau of Prisons, individual capacity, JUAN MATTOS, JR., U.S. Marshall for District of New Jersey, individual capacity, DAVID M. SINGER, U.S. Marshall for Centrl District of California, individual capacity, GRACIE MELENDEZ, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, individual capacity, MICHAEL SMITH, Assistant Director of the Health Services Division, official capacity, ADEL AWAD, Chief Medical Officer Primary Care Provider, JENNIFER MIRANDA, Physician Assistant, JOHN DOE, No. 1, W. Z. JENKINS, II, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center Los Angeles, Ms LEEN, Health Service Administration, individual capacity also known as Jane Doe, Ms LUX, Associate Warden, individual capacity also known as Jane Doe, JEANETTE MIRANDA, Physician Assistant, Metropolitan Detention Center, C. Peters, CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC and CoreCivic CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
| 25-3882 |
| June 23, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/13/2025 05:46 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Before: Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) for appointment of pro bono counsel is granted. After securing counsel, the court will set a new briefing schedule. [Entered: 11/07/2025 10:37 AM]
|
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Jeremy Martin Haar is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 08/08/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Jeremy Martin Haar. [Entered: 08/08/2025 02:07 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Appellant Jeremy Martin Haar, prison identification number 08518-509, is proceeding in forma pauperis and has filed the form authorizing prison officials to assess, collect, and forward to the district court the fees for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2). This court assesses an initial filing fee that equals 20 percent of the greater of: (A) the average monthly deposits to appellants prison trust account; or (B) the average monthly balance in appellants account for the six months preceding June 12, 2025, when the notice of appeal was filed. Payments will not be made when funds in the account total less than $10, but payments will resume when funds become available. The clerk will serve this order and the authorization form on officials at the FMC Devens who must notify the agency or prison authority responsible for administering payments for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). Each payment should be accompanied by the district court and appeals court docket numbers for this case and a record of prior payments made for this appeal. The clerk will also serve a copy of this order on the district court clerk and the district court financial unit. [Entered: 07/21/2025 04:37 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Received PLRA Authorization filed by Appellant Jeremy Martin Haar. [Entered: 07/16/2025 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Jeremy Martin Haar. [Entered: 07/15/2025 02:20 PM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 06/25/2025 04:13 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/4/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/2/2025. For appeal no. 25-3882, 2:22-cv-04827-CV-DFM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/23/2025 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-04827-CV-DFM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3882 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/23/2025 11:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
