Williams v. Leeflang, et al.
Plaintiff: KENT WILLIAMS
Defendant: Paralegal LEEFLANG, ROBBERT WHEILER, Warden RICHARDSON, D. W. MARTINEZ, HUST, GIBNEY, A. HOTTINGER and SEGADELLI
Case Number: 25-3921
Filed: June 24, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for voluntary dismissal is granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This case is dismissed. This order serves as the mandate of the court. [Entered: 09/05/2025 11:15 AM]
August 28, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss filed by Appellant Kent Williams. [Entered: 08/28/2025 03:01 PM]
August 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) to consolidate is denied. The motions to stay appellate proceedings (Docket Entry Nos. 4, 6, 9) are denied. The pro se opening brief is due October 6, 2025. The answering brief is due November 5, 2025. The optional pro se reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellant is not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellant does not submit excerpts, appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 08/20/2025 08:52 AM]
August 15, 2025 Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court (DE 4) filed by Appellant Kent Williams. [Entered: 08/15/2025 02:19 PM]
July 30, 2025 Filing 8 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet in reponse to the request filed on 07/30/2025. [Entered: 07/30/2025 03:05 PM]
July 30, 2025 Filing 7 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Kent Williams. [Entered: 07/30/2025 02:18 PM]
July 7, 2025 Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court (DE 4) filed by Appellant Kent Williams. [Entered: 07/08/2025 02:19 PM]
July 1, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION to Consolidate filed by Appellant Kent Williams. [Court edit to replace correct PDF] [Entered: 07/02/2025 09:39 AM] [Edited: 07/02/2025 11:07 AM]
July 1, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Appellant Kent Williams. [Entered: 07/02/2025 09:38 AM]
June 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 06/27/2025 03:45 PM]
June 24, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/4/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/2/2025. For appeal no. 25-3921, 1:22-cv-00052-DCN. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/24/2025 11:57 AM]
June 24, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:22-cv-00052-DCN has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3921 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/24/2025 11:49 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Williams v. Leeflang, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KENT WILLIAMS
Represented By: Kent Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paralegal LEEFLANG
Represented By: Leeflang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBBERT WHEILER
Represented By: Robbert Wheiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Warden RICHARDSON
Represented By: Hannah Grace Chute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. W. MARTINEZ
Represented By: D. W. Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HUST
Represented By: Hust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GIBNEY
Represented By: Gibney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. HOTTINGER
Represented By: A. Hottinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SEGADELLI
Represented By: Segadelli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?