Reeves v. Borzin, et al.
| LINDA JOYCE REEVES |
| JONATHAN BORZIN, YESENIA SANCHEZ, Sheriff, DIMARCO HOSKINS, EDWARD ALVARADO, MARCO TORRES and JOHN RUIZ |
| 25-3944 |
| June 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 PHYSICAL EXHIBITS (4 copies) filed by Appellees: Video exhibits B, C, D, E, F, I, J, K, L, and M on USB drive. [Entered: 11/18/2025 11:29 AM] |
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. On July 30, 2025, appellant filed a motion (Docket Entry No. 6) asking this court to retrieve body camera footage from the district court. On November 13, 2025, this court received from the district court a digital copy of Exhibit A, lodged in the district court on April 30, 2025, as Exhibit No. 76-1 (District Court Docket No. 76). Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 6) is therefore denied as moot. Appellees motion (Docket Entry No. 15) pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 27-14 for leave to transmit physical exhibit is granted. Appellees shall submit 4 copies of the exhibit within 7 days of the date of this order. [Entered: 11/14/2025 10:48 AM]
|
| Filing 17 Physical exhibits received from district court: District Court docket no. 76-1, Exhibit A [Entered: 11/13/2025 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 12 by Appellees received. [Entered: 11/05/2025 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Transmit Exhibit filed by Appellee Jonathan Borzin, Appellee Dimarco Hoskins, Appellee Marco Torres, Appellee John Ruiz. [Entered: 10/31/2025 10:05 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 12 by Appellees is filed. Appellees must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be addressed to the Clerks principal office and mailed or transmitted to a delivery service within 7 days of this order. The Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 13 by Appellees are filed. No paper copies of the excerpts are required at this time. [Entered: 10/30/2025 11:33 AM]
|
| Filing 13 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Jonathan Borzin, Appellee Dimarco Hoskins, Appellee Marco Torres, Appellee John Ruiz. [Entered: 10/29/2025 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 12 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Jonathan Borzin, Appellee Dimarco Hoskins, Appellee Marco Torres, Appellee John Ruiz. [Entered: 10/29/2025 03:35 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 10) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/30/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/26/2025 03:09 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Jonathan Borzin, Appellee Dimarco Hoskins, Appellee Marco Torres, Appellee John Ruiz. [Entered: 09/26/2025 12:26 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Sidney R. THOMAS, Mark J. BENNETT The court, in its discretion, denies the motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for appointment of pro bono counsel. The motion (Docket Entry No. 6) to transmit physical exhibit is referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal. The answering brief is due September 30, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 09/02/2025 03:21 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 7) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary pending resolution of the motion to appoint counsel (DE5). [Entered: 08/29/2025 03:48 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Jonathan Borzin, Appellee Dimarco Hoskins, Appellee Marco Torres, Appellee John Ruiz. [Entered: 08/29/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Transmit Physical Exhibit filed by Appellant Linda Joyce Reeves. [Entered: 07/31/2025 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Linda Joyce Reeves. [Entered: 07/30/2025 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Linda Joyce Reeves is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 07/30/2025 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Linda Joyce Reeves. [Entered: 07/30/2025 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/4/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/3/2025. For appeal no. 25-3944, 3:23-cv-06237-LB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/25/2025 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cv-06237-LB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-3944 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/25/2025 10:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
