Bennett v. Monroe Detention Center, et al.
Plaintiff: DAVID BENNETT
Defendant: MONROE DETENTION CENTER, YOLO COUNTY JAIL, WELL PATH DIRECTOR, ROSEMARY GLADDEN, OVIEDO, Detention Commander, Monroe Detention Center, SCHNIDER, Law Librarian, Monroe Detention Center and LANCASTER, Doctor, Monroe Detention Center
Case Number: 25-4013
Filed: June 27, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2025 Filing 21 CLERK ACTION: 2nd Opening Brief submitted at DE 20 by Appellant David Bennett is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 11/28/2025 02:02 PM]
November 25, 2025 Filing 20 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 11/28/2025 02:01 PM]
November 21, 2025 Filing 19 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 18 by Appellant David Bennett is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 11/21/2025 10:41 AM]
November 20, 2025 Filing 18 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 11/21/2025 10:39 AM]
November 17, 2025 Filing 17 MOTION for Production of Transcripts at Government Expense filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 11/19/2025 08:57 AM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 16 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 10/21/2025 02:12 PM]
October 14, 2025 Filing 15 MOTION to Reconsider Nondispositive Order filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 10/14/2025 03:39 PM]
September 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS The court, in its discretion, denies the supplemented motion (Docket Entry Nos. 6, 8, 11) for appointment of pro bono counsel. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for appointment of a guardian ad litem is denied. The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due November 17, 2025. The answering brief is due December 17, 2025. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. Appellant is not required to submit excerpts of record. If appellant does not submit excerpts, appellees must submit all documents cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by the rules. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1. [Entered: 09/25/2025 04:59 PM]
August 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Appellant David Bennett, prison identification number P00396164, is proceeding in forma pauperis and has filed the form authorizing prison officials to assess, collect, and forward to the district court the fees for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2). This court assesses an initial filing fee that equals 20 percent of the greater of: (A) the average monthly deposits to appellants prison trust account; or (B) the average monthly balance in appellants account for the six months preceding June 25, 2025, when the notice of appeal was filed. Payments will not be made when funds in the account total less than $10, but payments will resume when funds become available. The clerk will serve this order and the authorization form on officials at the Yolo County Detention Center, 140A Tony Diaz Drive, Woodland, CA 95776 who must notify the agency or prison authority responsible for administering payments for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). Each payment should be accompanied by the district court and appeals court docket numbers for this case and a record of prior payments made for this appeal. The clerk will also serve a copy of this order on the district court clerk and the district court financial unit. [Entered: 08/12/2025 01:12 PM]
August 5, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 08/05/2025 02:30 PM]
August 5, 2025 Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Appointment of Counsel (DE 6) filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 08/05/2025 02:29 PM]
July 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 9) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary pending resolution of the motion to appoint counsel (DE6). [Entered: 07/31/2025 04:57 PM]
July 30, 2025 Filing 9 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file brief for 30 days filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 07/31/2025 03:08 PM]
July 30, 2025 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Appointment of Counsel (DE 6) filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 07/30/2025 03:04 PM]
July 30, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 07/30/2025 02:26 PM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 07/29/2025 10:22 AM]
July 28, 2025 Filing 5 Received PLRA Authorization filed by Appellant David Bennett. [Entered: 07/29/2025 10:20 AM]
July 15, 2025 Filing 4 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant David Bennett. Action taken: resending to # P00396164, Yolo County Detention Center, 140A Tony Diaz Drive, Woodland, CA 95776. [Entered: 07/15/2025 05:01 PM]
July 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. Appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. That status continues in this court because it has not been revoked. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The full $605 in fees for this appeal will still be collected when adequate funds are available in appellants prison trust account. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1), (b)(2). Within 21 days, appellant must complete the enclosed authorization form and file it with this court. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [Entered: 07/09/2025 12:24 PM]
June 27, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/6/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/5/2025. For appeal no. 25-4013, 2:22-cv-02157-DJC-SCR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/27/2025 02:04 PM]
June 27, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-02157-DJC-SCR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4013 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/27/2025 01:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bennett v. Monroe Detention Center, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID BENNETT
Represented By: David Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MONROE DETENTION CENTER
Represented By: Mr. Eric May
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: YOLO COUNTY JAIL
Represented By: Mr. Eric May
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WELL PATH DIRECTOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROSEMARY GLADDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OVIEDO, Detention Commander, Monroe Detention Center
Represented By: Mr. Eric May
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCHNIDER, Law Librarian, Monroe Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LANCASTER, Doctor, Monroe Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?