IYO, Inc. v. IO Products, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: IYO, INC.
Defendant: IO PRODUCTS, INC., OPENAI, INC., OPENAI, LLC, SAM ALTMAN and JONATHAN PAUL IVE
Case Number: 25-4028
Filed: June 27, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 3, 2025 IYO, INC. V. IO PRODUCTS, INC., ET AL.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 41 BILL of COSTS filed by Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 12/16/2025 11:55 AM]
December 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Sidney R. THOMAS, Daniel A. BRESS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr.) AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 12/03/2025 11:26 AM]
November 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Sidney R. THOMAS, Daniel A. BRESS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr.. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 11/21/2025 01:40 PM]
November 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 38 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 11/17/2025 02:37 PM]
November 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 37 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. [Entered: 11/14/2025 04:14 PM]
October 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Anthony Viola for Appellee IYO, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 7/31/2025 8:00:00 AM, 11/21/2025 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 10/24/2025 01:04 PM]
October 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Margret Mary Caruso for Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 7/31/2025 8:00:00 AM, 11/21/2025 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [Entered: 10/24/2025 08:27 AM]
September 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 34 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 09/29/2025 12:10 PM]
September 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 33 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. [Entered: 09/24/2025 06:07 PM]
September 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 32 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Valerie Phan, representing Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 09/15/2025 02:56 PM]
September 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 31 NOTICE of Withdrawal as Counsel filed by Valerie Phan. Counsel withdrawing on behalf of other attorney(s): No [[-]]. Party proceeding without counsel: No. [-]. [Entered: 09/15/2025 02:53 PM]
September 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 30 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Friday, November 21, 2025 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [25-4028] [Entered: 09/07/2025 05:05 PM]
September 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 29 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 27 by Appellants IO Products, Inc., OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI, LLC, and Sam Altman received. (sent to panel) [Entered: 09/03/2025 02:10 PM]
August 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 27 by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/29/2025 08:20 AM]
August 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 27 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. [Entered: 08/28/2025 10:49 PM]
August 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 26 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellee IYO, Inc. received. (sent to panel) [Entered: 08/19/2025 03:17 PM]
August 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 22 by Appellee IYO, Inc. received. (sent to panel) [Entered: 08/19/2025 02:57 PM]
August 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 24 PHYSICAL EXHIBITS (4 copies) filed by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman: Video exhibits on USB drive. [Entered: 08/18/2025 04:13 PM]
August 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellee IYO, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 22 by Appellee IYO, Inc. are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/14/2025 04:08 PM]
August 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 22 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 08/14/2025 04:03 PM]
August 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 08/14/2025 04:01 PM]
August 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. The motion for leave to transmit physical exhibits, Dkt. 12, is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 27-14. Counsel must submit 4 copies of the exhibits within 7 days of this order. [Entered: 08/14/2025 12:07 PM]
August 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Anthony Viola [Entered: 08/07/2025 01:04 PM]
August 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Kara M. Cormier [Entered: 08/07/2025 01:01 PM]
August 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Viola for Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 08/07/2025 12:41 PM]
August 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kara M. Cormier for Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 08/07/2025 12:33 PM]
July 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellants IO Products, Inc., OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI, LLC, and Sam Altman received. (sent to panel) [Entered: 07/30/2025 03:59 PM]
July 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 3 Volumes and Index Volume submitted at DE 11 by Appellants IO Products, Inc., OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI, LLC, and Sam Altman received. (sent to panel) [Entered: 07/30/2025 03:56 PM]
July 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 11 by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/25/2025 02:15 PM]
July 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION to Transmit Physical Exhibit filed by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. [Entered: 07/24/2025 10:18 PM]
July 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. [Entered: 07/24/2025 10:16 PM]
July 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. [Entered: 07/24/2025 10:14 PM]
July 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee IYO, Inc.. [Entered: 07/23/2025 02:38 PM]
July 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for November 2025 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [Case List] [Entered: 07/18/2025 11:02 AM]
July 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. Barry G. SILVERMAN, Lawrence VANDYKE The stipulated motion (Docket Entry No. 4) to expedite is granted in part. The opening brief is due July 24, 2025. The answering brief is due August 14, 2025. The optional reply brief is due August 28, 2025. The clerk will place this case on the calendar for November 2025, which is the next available calendar. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 3.3(f). [Entered: 07/17/2025 04:01 PM]
July 10, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. [Entered: 07/10/2025 11:10 AM]
July 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. [Entered: 07/09/2025 05:09 PM]
July 9, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Expedite filed by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. [Entered: 07/09/2025 05:08 PM]
July 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant IO Products, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, Inc., Appellant OpenAI, LLC, Appellant Sam Altman. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 07/02/2025 06:41 PM]
June 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 7/2/2025, Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/25/2025, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/22/2025. For appeal no. 25-4028, 3:25-cv-04861-TLT.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/27/2025 04:34 PM]
June 27, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-04861-TLT has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4028 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/27/2025 04:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: IYO, Inc. v. IO Products, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IYO, INC.
Represented By: Valerie Phan
Represented By: Mr. Andrew David Skale
Represented By: Anthony Viola
Represented By: Kara M. Cormier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IO PRODUCTS, INC.
Represented By: Arian Joseph Koochesfahani
Represented By: John Bash
Represented By: Margret Mary Caruso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OPENAI, INC.
Represented By: Arian Joseph Koochesfahani
Represented By: John Bash
Represented By: Margret Mary Caruso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OPENAI, LLC
Represented By: Arian Joseph Koochesfahani
Represented By: John Bash
Represented By: Margret Mary Caruso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAM ALTMAN
Represented By: Arian Joseph Koochesfahani
Represented By: John Bash
Represented By: Margret Mary Caruso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JONATHAN PAUL IVE
Represented By: Craig Stewart
Represented By: David Craig Kiernan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?