Lee v. Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., et al.
| RICHARD JOHN LEE |
| CHARLES SCHWAB & CO, INC., GREG SCANLON, RICHARD DANGERFIELD, W. HARDY CALLCOTT, RICHARD A. FIEDELMAN, GERALD FUJIMOTO and DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP |
| 25-4064 |
| June 30, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Appellant Richard John Lee. [Entered: 12/02/2025 09:20 AM] |
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard C. TALLMAN, Patrick J. BUMATAY) The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for judicial notice is granted. The motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for summary disposition is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a) (standard for summary disposition); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). The district courts judgment is affirmed. All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. AFFIRMED. [Entered: 11/21/2025 11:26 AM]
|
| Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion for Summary Disposition (DE 15) filed by Appellee Richard A. Fiedelman, Appellee Gerald Fujimoto, Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP. [Court entered filing, PDF from DE 19] [Entered: 09/29/2025 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 21 SUPPLEMENT to Motion for Summary Disposition (DE 10) filed by Appellee Richard A. Fiedelman, Appellee Gerald Fujimoto, Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP. [Entered: 09/26/2025 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to Motion to Expedite (DE 17) filed by Appellee Richard A. Fiedelman, Appellee Gerald Fujimoto, Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP. [Entered: 09/26/2025 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion to Submit Case on Briefs Without Oral Argument (DE 18) filed by Appellee Richard A. Fiedelman, Appellee Gerald Fujimoto, Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP. [Entered: 09/26/2025 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Submit Case on Briefs Without Oral Argument filed by Appellant Richard John Lee. [Court entered filing, PDF from DE 15] [Entered: 09/22/2025 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Expedite filed by Appellant Richard John Lee. [Court entered filing, PDF from DE 15] [Entered: 09/22/2025 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion for Judicial Notice (DE 11) filed by Appellant Richard John Lee. [Entered: 09/22/2025 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion for Summary Disposition (DE 10) filed by Appellant Richard John Lee. [Entered: 09/22/2025 09:08 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 12) denied as unnecessary, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 13) denied as unnecessary. It is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary pending resolution of the motion for summary disposition (DE10). [Entered: 09/17/2025 04:16 PM]
|
| Filing 13 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Richard A. Fiedelman, Appellee Gerald Fujimoto, Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP. [Entered: 09/17/2025 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 12 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., Appellee Greg Scanlon, Appellee Richard Dangerfield, Appellee W. Hardy Callcott. [Entered: 09/16/2025 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Judicial Notice filed by Appellee Richard A. Fiedelman, Appellee Gerald Fujimoto, Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP. [Court entered filing, PDFs from DE 10] [Entered: 09/12/2025 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Summary Disposition filed by Appellee Richard A. Fiedelman, Appellee Gerald Fujimoto, Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP. [Entered: 09/12/2025 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Richard John Lee is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 09/03/2025 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Richard John Lee. [Entered: 09/02/2025 10:43 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 6) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 9/10/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/10/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/18/2025 04:01 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Richard John Lee. [Entered: 07/18/2025 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Charles Schwab & Co, Inc., Appellee Greg Scanlon, Appellee Richard Dangerfield, Appellee W. Hardy Callcott. [Entered: 07/14/2025 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Richard A. Fiedelman, Appellee Gerald Fujimoto, Appellee Deloitte & Touche, LLP. [Entered: 07/14/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Richard John Lee. [Entered: 07/09/2025 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/11/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/8/2025. For appeal no. 25-4064, 2:25-cv-00558-JDP. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 06/30/2025 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00558-JDP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4064 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/30/2025 04:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
