United States of America v. Wenger
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DEVON WENGER |
| 25-407 |
| January 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MANDATE ISSUED Barry G. SILVERMAN, Kim McLane WARDLAW, Roopali H. DESAI [Entered: 03/14/2025 09:36 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Kim McLane WARDLAW, Roopali H. DESAI) The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted because the district courts order of January 10, 2025,is not appealable as a final judgment or an order that comes within the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 798-99 (1989) (describing collateral order doctrine); United States v. Renzi, 651 F.3d 1012, 1019 (9th Cir. 2011) (denial of a suppression motion cannot be raised on interlocutory appeal under the collateral order doctrine). All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 02/18/2025 01:22 PM]
|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 11) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 02/12/2025 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 3) filed by Appellant Devon Wenger. [Entered: 02/05/2025 11:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Court Entered Filing tocorrect entry#9] [Entered: 02/05/2025 03:22 PM] [Edited: 02/05/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE---EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Devon Wenger.[Filed under wrong event. Correct entry#10] [Entered: 02/03/2025 08:23 PM] [Edited: 02/05/2025 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed Pro Se filed by Appellant Devon Wenger. [Entered: 02/03/2025 07:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Devon Wenger for Appellant Devon Wenger. [Entered: 02/03/2025 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Nicole Rachel Castronovo, representing Appellant Devon Christopher Wenger. [Entered: 01/31/2025 01:32 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion (Docket Entry No. 4) by Nicole R. Castronovo to withdraw as counsel is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). Appellant pro se may file a response to the governments motion to dismiss by February 10, 2025. The governments optional reply is due within 7 days after service of the response. The clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually. Former counsel is reminded that, in future appeals, a motion to withdraw must be served on appellant, and the proof of service must include appellants current address. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). [Entered: 01/31/2025 01:31 PM]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Nicole Rachel Castronovo for Appellant Devon Christopher Wenger. [Entered: 01/30/2025 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 01/28/2025 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: N/A. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 2/3/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 3/5/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 4/14/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 5/14/2025. For appeal no. 25-407, 4:23-cr-00269-JSW-3. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 01/21/2025 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:23-cr-00269-JSW-3 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-407 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/21/2025 03:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Wenger | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Eric Cheng |
| Represented By: | Ms. Alexandra Jill Shepard |
| Represented By: | Mr. Ajay Krishnamurthy |
| Represented By: | Merry Jean Chan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DEVON WENGER | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Nicole Rachel Castronovo |
| Represented By: | Devon Wenger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
