Roach v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
| ROBERT M. ROACH, JR. |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO |
| SCHRADER CELLARS, LLC |
| 25-4208 |
| July 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. (Milan D. SMITH, Jr., Mark J. BENNETT, Anthony D. JOHNSTONE) Petitioner has not demonstrated that he is entitled to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Tsay JBR LLC, 136 F.4th 1176, 1179 (9th Cir. 2025); In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 89798 (9th Cir. 2021). The petition is denied. Petitioners emergency motion to stay the district court proceedings pending resolution of his mandamus petition, Docket No. 6, is denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 08/07/2025 05:27 PM]
|
| Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings, Order, or Judgment (DE 10) filed by Petitioner Robert M. Roach, Jr.. [Entered: 07/23/2025 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings, Order, or Judgment (DE 6) filed by Real Party in Interest Schrader Cellars, LLC. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 8.] [Entered: 07/21/2025 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 9 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Real Party in Interest Schrader Cellars, LLC. [Entered: 07/21/2025 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Real Party in Interest Schrader Cellars, LLC. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 10.] [Entered: 07/21/2025 03:13 PM] [Edited: 07/21/2025 03:31 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. The previous panel has retained jurisdiction of this appeal. Oral argument, if any, will be scheduled in due course. [Entered: 07/14/2025 02:23 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings/Order/Judgment filed by Petitioner Robert M. Roach, Jr.. [COURT ENTERED FILING to refile motion in DE 5.] [Entered: 07/10/2025 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Petitioner Robert M. Roach, Jr.. [COURT UPDATE: Removed motion and refiled at DE 6.] [Entered: 07/10/2025 02:25 PM] [Edited: 07/10/2025 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Robert M. Roach, Jr.. [Entered: 07/09/2025 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 07/08/2025 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/8/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4208 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 07/08/2025 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Robert M. Roach, Jr.. [Entered: 07/08/2025 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Roach v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROBERT M. ROACH, JR. | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Manuel Lopez |
| Represented By: | Mr. Robert Dubose |
| Represented By: | William Joseph Boyce |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: SCHRADER CELLARS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Sarah Goetz |
| Represented By: | Ronald Casey Low |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Frederick Ruef |
| Represented By: | Stacie O. Kinser |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.