Preston v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
| JOSHUA MATTHEW PRESTON |
| UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| 25-4287 |
| July 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| PRESTON V. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONSecurities and Exchange CommissionAgencyBerzon, Marsha S., Nguyen, Jacqueline H., Owens, John B. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Respondent) 2/4/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/16/2025 02:08 PM]
|
| Filing 17 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Respondent United States Securities and Exchange Commission. [Entered: 12/16/2025 12:52 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. The stay of the briefing schedule is lifted. The answering brief is due January 5, 2026. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 12/03/2025 10:21 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 14) to conclude briefing and expedite judicial review is denied. Pursuant to the Orders of the Chief Judge dated October 1, 2025 and October 17, 2025, filing deadlines for all federally funded attorneys are stayed and will be reset upon the conclusion of the shutdown. The deadline to file the answering brief is therefore stayed pending further court order. [Entered: 11/04/2025 11:53 AM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to Expedite filed by Petitioner Joshua Matthew Preston. [Entered: 10/31/2025 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 13 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 and Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 10 by Petitioner Joshua Matthew Preston are filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 09/30/2025 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of change of address filed by Petitioner Joshua Matthew Preston.[COURT ENTERED-Filing from DE#11] [Entered: 09/29/2025 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE---STATUS REPORT filed by Petitioner Joshua Matthew Preston.[Filed under wrong event. Correct entry#12] [Entered: 09/29/2025 02:05 PM] [Edited: 09/29/2025 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 10 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Petitioner Joshua Matthew Preston. [Entered: 09/29/2025 09:11 AM] |
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Joshua Matthew Preston. [Entered: 09/29/2025 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED LIST OF AGENCY RECORD filed by Respondent United States Securities and Exchange Commission. [Entered: 08/19/2025 07:57 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Rachel McKenzie [Entered: 07/24/2025 08:06 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachel McKenzie for Respondent United States Securities and Exchange Commission. [Entered: 07/24/2025 07:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Petitioner Joshua Matthew Preston. [Entered: 07/11/2025 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 FEE PAID by Joshua Matthew Preston, Rcpt. No:100000512. [Entered: 07/11/2025 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 9/29/2025, Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 10/29/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 07/11/2025 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/11/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4287 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/11/2025 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Joshua Matthew Preston. [Entered: 07/11/2025 02:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Preston v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSHUA MATTHEW PRESTON | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Matthew Preston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |
| Represented By: | Tracey Hardin |
| Represented By: | Ms. Rachel McKenzie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
