Nguyen v. One Finance, Inc., et al.
| JONATHAN NGUYEN |
| ONE FINANCE, INC. and COINBASE, INC. |
| 25-4398 |
| July 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response to Motion to Reinstate (DE 23) filed by Appellant Jonathan Nguyen. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 10/28/2025 11:08 PM] |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion to Reinstate (DE 22) filed by Appellee One Finance, Inc.. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 10/20/2025 06:42 PM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Reinstate filed by Appellant Jonathan Nguyen. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 10/10/2025 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 17 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Andrei Armas [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrei Armas for Appellee Jonathan Nguyen. [25-4398, 25-4124] [Entered: 10/09/2025 10:52 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrei Armas for Appellant Jonathan Nguyen. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 10/09/2025 10:43 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrei Armas for Appellant Jonathan Nguyen. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 10/09/2025 10:42 PM] |
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Appellant Nguyen has not filed a statement explaining why appeal No. 25-4124 should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, as ordered by this court on August 20, 2025. Appeal No. 25-4124 is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. In light of cross-appellants September 10, 2025 filing (Docket Entry No. 16), cross-appeal No. 25-4398 is voluntarily dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 09/24/2025 02:44 PM]
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 11) filed by Appellant One Finance, Inc.. [25-4398, 25-4124] [Entered: 09/10/2025 05:15 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The parties previously appealed the district courts November 20, 2024 order granting defendant One Finance, Inc.s motion to dismiss (appeal Nos. 25-1290 and 25-1292). In those appeals, this court ordered the parties either to file motions to voluntarily dismiss or to explain why the appeals should not be dismissed, because the claims against defendant Coinbase, Inc. (Coinbase) remained pending in the district court. The parties ultimately voluntarily dismissed appeal Nos. 25-1290 and 25-1292. . . . Within 21 days, each party must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss their respective appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If either party does not do so, the court will dismiss their appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If either party files a statement, the other party may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 08/20/2025 09:33 AM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. . It is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 08/11/2025 04:55 PM]
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Order - Call for Response to Filing (DE 5) filed by Appellant One Finance, Inc.. [25-4398, 25-4124] [Entered: 08/11/2025 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Jonathan Nguyen. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 08/11/2025 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to [-] (DE [-]) filed by Appellee Jonathan Nguyen. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 07/31/2025 09:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 07/31/2025 03:08 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. On July 10, 2025, this court ordered appellant Nguyen to file either a motion for voluntary dismissal of appeal No. 25-4124 or a statement explaining why that appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, because the district court has not resolved the claims against defendant Coinbase, Inc. or otherwise issued an appealable order since the parties voluntarily dismissed prior appeal Nos. 25-1290 and 25-1292. See 28 U.S.C. 1291 Appellant Nguyens response to the July 10, 2025 order remains due July 31, 2025. No later than August 11, 2025, cross-appellant One Finance, Inc. must file either a motion for voluntary dismissal of appeal No. 25-4398 or a statement explaining why that appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Also by August 11, 2025, cross-appellant One Finance, Inc. may file a response to any statement that appeal No. 25-4124 should not be dismissed filed by appellant Nguyen. If cross-appellant One Finance, Inc. files a statement why appeal No. 25-4398 should not be dismissed, appellant Nguyen may file a response within 10 days. If either party fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss their respective appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Briefing is stayed. [25-4398, 25-4124] [Entered: 07/24/2025 04:35 PM]
|
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee One Finance, Inc.. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 07/21/2025 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellee One Finance, Inc.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [25-4124, 25-4398] [Entered: 07/21/2025 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 7/21/2025, Cross Appeal First Brief Due (Appellee) 8/14/2025, Cross Appeal Second Brief Due (Appellant) 9/15/2025, Cross Appeal Third Brief Due (Appellee) 10/15/2025. For appeal no. 25-4398, 2:24-cv-02818-ODW-JPR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [25-4398, 25-4124] [Entered: 07/16/2025 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-02818-ODW-JPR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4398 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/16/2025 03:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
