Oliver v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas
| ANTHONY PERRY OLIVER |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS |
| 25-4499 |
| July 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT. The judgment of this Court, entered 9/2/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 09/24/2025 10:24 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the July 15, 2025, July 23, 2025, and July 28, 2025 notices of appeal do not challenge a final or immediately appealable order entered by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal after the district courts final order and judgment entered on August 12, 2025. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/02/2025 02:46 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 08/04/2025 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/3/2025. For appeal no. 25-4499, 2:25-cv-01222-CDS-DJA. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/21/2025 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-01222-CDS-DJA has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4499 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/21/2025 03:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Oliver v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANTHONY PERRY OLIVER | |
| Represented By: | Anthony Perry Oliver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
