Sivak v. Donato
| LACEY SIVAK |
| JAMES DONATO, DISTRICT JUDGE |
| 25-4544 |
| July 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Richard R. CLIFTON, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Daniel A. BRESS. This court has reviewed the notices of appeal and the district court records in the actions listed above pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in appeal No. 23-80069. The appeals lack sufficient merit to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225, 1227 (9th Cir. 2007). The appeals are therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the Northern District of California, constitutes the mandate of this court. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained. DISMISSED. [25-4544, 25-4678] [Entered: 12/19/2025 09:54 AM]
|
| Filing 3 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 25-4544. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number {23-80069}, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [Entered: 07/22/2025 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:25-cv-04487-AMO has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4544 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/22/2025 04:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sivak v. Donato | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK | |
| Represented By: | Lacey Sivak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JAMES DONATO, DISTRICT JUDGE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
