Donald v. Lee, et al.
| KEITH DONALD |
| CHRIS LEE, ERIN TELLEZ, BIANCA CARDENAS, UNKNOWN PARTY, Lt. P# 1930, LESLIE PARK, KENNETH FRIZZELL and LARRY PHILLIPS |
| 25-4595 |
| July 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MANDATE ISSUED Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT. The judgment of this Court, entered 9/2/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 09/24/2025 11:14 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the July 20, 2025 notice of appeal does not challenge a final or immediately appealable order entered by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). Appellant has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977); see also Demos v. U.S. Dist. Court, 925 F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir. 1991) ([T]his court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to a state court.). The petition (Docket Entry No. 9) is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this case. DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part. [Entered: 09/02/2025 09:39 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 08/21/2025 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by . [Entered: 08/15/2025 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Keith Donald is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 08/13/2025 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Keith Donald. [Entered: 08/13/2025 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 6 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Keith Donald is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 08/07/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Keith Donald. [Entered: 08/07/2025 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Keith Donald. [Entered: 08/07/2025 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 District Court Order/Notice Received. [ RECEIPT of Payment: $ 605, receipt number 20015470 as to as to [69] Notice of Appeal, filed by Keith Donald. USCA Case Number 25-4595. [Entered: 07/31/2025 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/2/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 10/2/2025. For appeal no. 25-4595, 2:25-cv-00064-RFB-BNW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/24/2025 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00064-RFB-BNW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4595 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/24/2025 12:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.