Donathan v. Do, et al.
Plaintiff: DEBORA DONATHAN
Defendant: ANDREW DO, CHERI PHAM, KATHLEEN O'LEARY, ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, HARBOTTLE LAW GROUP, LOS ALAMITOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Case Number: 25-4598
Filed: July 24, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2025 Filing 16 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 11/10/2025 03:13 PM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 15 MANDATE ISSUED Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS. The judgment of this Court, entered 9/25/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 10/17/2025 09:24 AM]
October 2, 2025 Filing 14 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 10/06/2025 03:00 PM]
October 1, 2025 Filing 13 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 10/06/2025 02:56 PM]
September 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. (Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS) After considering the response to the courts August 11, 2025 order, we deny the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), (e)(2). All other pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/25/2025 03:41 PM]
August 15, 2025 Filing 11 RESPONSE to Order - General OSC (DE 8) filed by Appellant Debora Donathan. [Entered: 08/18/2025 11:49 AM]
August 14, 2025 Filing 10 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 08/18/2025 11:44 AM]
August 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 08/11/2025 11:56 AM]
August 8, 2025 Filing 9 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant Debora Donathan. [Entered: 08/12/2025 09:11 AM]
August 6, 2025 Filing 7 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 08/07/2025 08:32 AM]
August 6, 2025 Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Debora Donathan. [Entered: 08/06/2025 01:20 PM]
August 1, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Debora Donathan. [Entered: 08/04/2025 08:43 AM]
August 1, 2025 Filing 4 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 08/04/2025 08:41 AM]
July 31, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Debora Donathan. [Entered: 08/04/2025 08:40 AM]
July 24, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/2/2025. For appeal no. 25-4598, 8:25-cv-01351-MEMF-BFM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/24/2025 01:16 PM]
July 24, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:25-cv-01351-MEMF-BFM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4598 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/24/2025 01:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Donathan v. Do, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEBORA DONATHAN
Represented By: Debora Donathan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW DO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHERI PHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHLEEN O'LEARY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARBOTTLE LAW GROUP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOS ALAMITOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?