Banks v. County of San Mateo, et al.
Plaintiff: CARRIE BANKS
Defendant: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, SAN MATEO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, SAN MATEO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, STEPHEN M. WAGSTAFFE, SHIN-MEE CHANG, SHARRON LEE, LAURA ADAMS, JOHN KEENE, ALFONSO HERNANDEZ, ELISA KUHL, SANITH SISAVATH and THERESA DAH
Case Number: 25-4747
Filed: July 29, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2025 Filing 11 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 10 by Not Applicable San Mateo County District Attorney's Office, Appellee County of San Mateo, Not Applicable San Mateo County Probation Department, Appellee Stephen M. Wagstaffe, Appellee Shin-Mee Chang, Appellee Sharron Lee, Appellee Laura Adams, Appellee John Keene, Appellee Alfonso Hernandez, Appellee Elisa Kuhl, Appellee Sanith Sisavath, Appellee Theresa Dah is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 11/18/2025 11:00 AM]
November 17, 2025 Filing 10 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee County of San Mateo, Not Applicable San Mateo County District Attorney's Office, Not Applicable San Mateo County Probation Department, Appellee Stephen M. Wagstaffe, Appellee Shin-Mee Chang, Appellee Sharron Lee, Appellee Laura Adams, Appellee John Keene, Appellee Alfonso Hernandez, Appellee Elisa Kuhl, Appellee Sanith Sisavath, Appellee Theresa Dah. [Entered: 11/17/2025 03:39 PM]
October 24, 2025 Filing 9 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Carrie Banks received. [Entered: 10/24/2025 04:36 PM]
October 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Carrie Banks is filed. Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be addressed to the Clerks principal office and mailed or transmitted to a delivery service within 7 days of this order. The Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 7 by Appellant Carrie Banks are filed. No paper copies of the excerpts are required at this time. [Entered: 10/22/2025 10:41 AM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 7 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Carrie Banks.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 10/22/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 10/20/2025 07:20 PM] [Edited: 10/22/2025 10:15 AM]
October 17, 2025 Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Carrie Banks.--[COURT UPDATE: Corrected PDF attached as of 10/22/2025, REPLACING original attachment] [Entered: 10/17/2025 05:25 PM] [Edited: 10/22/2025 10:15 AM]
August 13, 2025 Filing 5 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 08/13/2025 10:45 AM]
August 4, 2025 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER: By 8/13/2025, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 08/04/2025 12:52 PM]
August 4, 2025 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Carrie Banks. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 08/04/2025 09:30 AM]
July 29, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 8/4/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 8/11/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 9/10/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 10/20/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 11/19/2025. For appeal no. 25-4747, 3:24-cv-08681-SI. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/29/2025 01:51 PM]
July 29, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-08681-SI has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4747 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/29/2025 01:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Banks v. County of San Mateo, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARRIE BANKS
Represented By: Aaron Zisser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAN MATEO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAN MATEO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STEPHEN M. WAGSTAFFE
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHIN-MEE CHANG
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHARRON LEE
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAURA ADAMS
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN KEENE
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALFONSO HERNANDEZ
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELISA KUHL
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SANITH SISAVATH
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THERESA DAH
Represented By: Lauren Francis Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?