Khan v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.
| AHMAD S. KHAN |
| AMAZON.COM, INC., its Parent, Subsidiaries, Affiliates, Owners, Officers, Directors, JEFF BEZOS, Founder and Chair Person, ANDY JASSY, President & CEO, BETH GALETTI, SVP, People Experience and Technology, APPLE INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ORACLE CORPORATION, SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES, BLACKROCK, INC., THE VANGUARD GROUP, INC., JOHN DOES, 8-50, CANDI CASTLEBERRY, VP Inclusive eXperiences & Technology, DAVID A. ZAPOLSKY, SVP, Global Public Policy & General Counsel, ROB WILLIAMS, VP Device Software & Services, ROHIT PRASAD, SVP Head Scientist Artificial General Intelligence, STEVE SCHMIDT, Chief Security Officer, ROYCE EVANS, Senior HR Business Partner, KRISTA BOOTH, Director of PXT, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, THE PENTAGON, NVIDIA CORPORATION, OPENAI, INC., SLACK, EQUITY RESIDENTIAL, FIDELITY INVESTMENTS INC, STATE STREET CORPORATION, T. ROWE PRICE GROUP INC., INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE, INC., THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, NASDAQ, INC., CBOE EXCHANGE, INC., CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE and JOHN DOES, 1-20 |
| 25-4757 |
| July 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Appellant has not filed a statement explaining why the issues to be raised in this appeal are substantial enough to justify full briefing, as ordered by this court on September 29, 2025. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 11/04/2025 11:57 AM]
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS The court, in its discretion, denies the motion (Docket Entry No. 4) for appointment of pro bono counsel. This appeal may be appropriate for summary disposition. See 9th Cir. R. 3- 6(a) (standard for summary disposition); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). Within 21 days, appellant must file a statement explaining why the issues to be raised in this appeal are substantial enough to justify full briefing. If appellant does not do so, this appeal may be dismissed without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The motion (Docket Entry No. 5) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is denied as unnecessary. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 09/29/2025 10:03 AM]
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Ahmad S. Khan. [Entered: 09/08/2025 08:59 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Ahmad S. Khan. [Entered: 08/29/2025 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Ahmad S. Khan. [Entered: 08/08/2025 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/8/2025. For appeal no. 25-4757, 2:24-cv-02152-JLR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/29/2025 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-02152-JLR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4757 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/29/2025 03:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.