Anthony v. Navient Corporation, et al.
| CALEB ANTHONY, an individual, on his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| NAVIENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
| 25-4772 |
| July 30, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 23) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 24) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 28) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 29) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Consolidated Reply Brief due 02/11/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [25-4772, 25-4222] [Entered: 01/02/2026 03:49 PM]
|
| Filing 24 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Joseph Cockrell. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 01/02/2026 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 23 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Caleb Anthony. [25-4772, 25-4222] [Entered: 01/02/2026 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 22 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 and Excerpts of Record at DE 26 by Appellees Navient Corporation and Navient Solutions, LLC are filed. No paper copies are required. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 12/29/2025 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 21 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Navient Corporation, Appellee Navient Solutions, LLC. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 12/22/2025 05:47 PM] |
| Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Navient Corporation, Appellee Navient Solutions, LLC. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 12/22/2025 05:42 PM] |
| Filing 19 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Travis Cory Gunn [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 12/22/2025 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Travis Cory Gunn for Appellee Navient Corporation, Appellee Navient Solutions, LLC. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 12/22/2025 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nicholas J. Hoffman for Appellee Navient Corporation, Appellee Navient Solutions, LLC. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 12/21/2025 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nicholas J. Hoffman for Appellee Navient Corporation, Appellee Navient Solutions, LLC. [25-4772, 25-4222] [Entered: 12/21/2025 02:55 PM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 14) granted, Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Consolidated Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/22/2025. Optional Consolidated Reply Brief due 21 days after service of the Consolidated Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 11/12/2025 03:35 PM]
|
| Filing 14 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Navient Corporation, Appellee Navient Solutions, LLC. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 11/11/2025 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 13 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Appellants Joseph Cockrell and Caleb Anthony is received. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 10/28/2025 03:50 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Appellants Joseph Cockrell and Caleb Anthony is filed. Appellants must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format securely bound on the left side with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be addressed to the Clerks principal office and mailed or transmitted to a delivery service within 7 days of this order. The Excerpts of Record submitted at DE 16 by Appellants Joseph Cockrell and Caleb Anthony are filed. No paper copies of the excerpts are required at this time. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 10/23/2025 03:24 PM]
|
| Filing 11 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Caleb Anthony, Appellant Joseph Cockrell. [25-4772, 25-4222]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect all party filers] [Entered: 10/21/2025 04:41 PM] [Edited: 10/23/2025 03:20 PM] |
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Caleb Anthony, Appellant Joseph Cockrell. [25-4772, 25-4222]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect all party filers] [Entered: 10/21/2025 04:38 PM] [Edited: 10/23/2025 03:15 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) to consolidate is granted. Nos. 25-4222 and 25-4772 are consolidated. The parties must include both case numbers on all future filings. The consolidated opening brief is due October 21, 2025. The consolidated answering brief is due November 20, 2025. The optional consolidated reply brief is due 21 days after the consolidated answering brief is served. [25-4222, 25-4772] [Entered: 08/25/2025 05:09 PM]
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Consolidate filed by Appellant Caleb Anthony. [Entered: 08/13/2025 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Navient Corporation, Appellee Navient Solutions, LLC. [Entered: 08/11/2025 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Ovca for Appellant Caleb Anthony. [Entered: 08/11/2025 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Caleb Anthony. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 08/04/2025 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Roger J. Perlstadt [Entered: 07/30/2025 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Roger J. Perlstadt for Appellant Caleb Anthony. [Entered: 07/30/2025 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 8/4/2025, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 8/12/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 9/11/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 10/21/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 11/20/2025. For appeal no. 25-4772, 2:24-cv-09600-AH-AS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/30/2025 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-09600-AH-AS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4772 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/30/2025 12:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
