Clark v. New Century Mortgage Company, et al.
| ALFRED CLARK |
| NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE COMPANY, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BARCLAYS CAPITAL REAL ESTATE, INC., WESTERN PROGRESSIVE NEVADA, INC. and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC |
| 25-4834 |
| July 31, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Foreclosure |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion to Stay Mandate (DE 14) filed by Appellant Alfred Clark. [Entered: 01/12/2026 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion to Stay Mandate (DE 12) filed by Appellee U.S. Bank National Association, Appellee Western Progressive Nevada, Inc., Appellee Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 13 PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING and PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Appellant Alfred Clark. [Entered: 01/02/2026 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Stay Mandate filed by Appellant Alfred Clark. [Entered: 01/02/2026 02:51 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. (Richard R. CLIFTON, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Daniel A. BRESS) The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) for leave to file a sur-reply is granted. Appellees motion (Docket Entry No. 3) to dismiss is granted in part. The notice of appeal is timely only as to the district courts July 16, 2025 order denying the second motion for reconsideration. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Upon review of the record and the opening brief, we summarily affirm the district courts July 16, 2025 order. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a) (standard for summary disposition); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). DISMISSSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART. [Entered: 12/16/2025 05:01 PM]
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion for Leave to File Reply (DE 8) filed by Appellee U.S. Bank National Association, Appellee Western Progressive Nevada, Inc., Appellee Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. [Entered: 11/13/2025 08:21 AM] |
| Filing 9 REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 7) filed by Appellant Alfred Clark. [Entered: 11/04/2025 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Reply filed by Appellant Alfred Clark. [Entered: 11/04/2025 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 6) filed by Appellee U.S. Bank National Association, Appellee Western Progressive Nevada, Inc., Appellee Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. [Entered: 10/24/2025 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 3) filed by Appellant Alfred Clark. [Entered: 10/17/2025 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant Alfred Clark is filed. Original and 3 copies. (briefing remains stayed, motion to dismiss pending)--[COURT UPDATE: received 3 additional paper copies] [Entered: 10/14/2025 03:32 PM] [Edited: 10/20/2025 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Alfred Clark.--[COURT UPDATE: attached PDF of exhibits] [Entered: 10/14/2025 03:31 PM] [Edited: 10/14/2025 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee U.S. Bank National Association, Appellee Western Progressive Nevada, Inc., Appellee Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. [Entered: 10/06/2025 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 8/11/2025, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 9/10/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 10/20/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 11/19/2025. For appeal no. 25-4834, 2:18-cv-02241-APG-BNW. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/31/2025 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:18-cv-02241-APG-BNW has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4834 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/31/2025 04:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
