Allen v. Garrett
| GENE ANTHONY HARRY ALLEN |
| TIM GARRETT |
| 25-4886 |
| August 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 10/03/2025 03:30 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, OWENS, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. Pursuant to the prefiling review order entered in Docket No. 09-80097, the court has reviewed the application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition. The application fails to make a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2), and is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review. Accordingly, it will not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Application No. 25-4886 is therefore denied. Any pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in Application No. 25-4886. DENIED. [Entered: 09/23/2025 02:29 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 09/03/2025 09:31 AM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. The court will not require the applicant to submit a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and Ninth Circuit Rule 26.1-1. The applicants related motion (Docket Entry No. 4) to appoint counsel, and motion (Docket Entry No. 4) to extend time, and request for Form 34, are therefore unnecessary. [Entered: 08/22/2025 05:01 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 08/18/2025 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 SOS PREFILING REVIEW DOCKETING NOTICE. This case has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 25-4886. This case is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 25-4886, and will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. [Entered: 08/04/2025 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/4/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4886 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 08/04/2025 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to File 28 U.S.C. 2254 Second or Successive Petition. [Entered: 08/04/2025 01:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Allen v. Garrett | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: GENE ANTHONY HARRY ALLEN | |
| Represented By: | Gene Anthony Harry Allen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: TIM GARRETT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
