Reeves v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.
| MICHAEL D. REEVES |
| UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, PREMISE DATA CORPORATION and ALEJANDRO NICOLAS MAYORKAS |
| 25-4975 |
| August 6, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Michael D. Reeves. [Entered: 12/15/2025 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 9 On November 13, 2025, the court issued a global order resetting the non-jurisdictional filing deadlines for federally funded attorneys (including FPDs and CJA counsel), that had been stayed by the courts October 1, 2025 Supplemental Administrative Order. If your deadlines were suspended by the October 1 Administrative Order, please review the #Order Resetting Deadlines, available on the courts website, to find your new deadlines. [Entered: 11/14/2025 03:51 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 6) for permission to file electronically is unnecessary. A pro se party does not need permission to register for electronic filing in this court. Registration information can be found at https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/efiling/. The courts August 6, 2025 order was returned to the court as undeliverable. Appellant must report any change of address to this court in writing as soon as possible. See 9th Cir. R. 46-3. Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be addressed by separate order. The opening brief was filed August 11, 2025. There is no appearance by appellees, so briefing is complete. [Entered: 09/04/2025 09:33 AM]
|
| Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED. DE 2 addressed to Appellant Michael D. Reeves. Action taken: none (no forwarding address found). [Entered: 08/21/2025 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Michael D. Reeves is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 08/13/2025 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 6 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 08/15/2025 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Michael D. Reeves. [Entered: 08/15/2025 01:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Michael D. Reeves. [Entered: 08/13/2025 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/15/2025. For appeal no. 25-4975, 2:25-cv-06312-JLS-DTB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/06/2025 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-06312-JLS-DTB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-4975 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/06/2025 04:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
