NACO, LLC, et al. v. Card
Plaintiff: NACO, LLC and CA EVIVA OWNER, LLC
Defendant: DARNELL CARD
Case Number: 25-5060
Filed: August 11, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2026 Filing 16 Document received in this closed case after court order stating that no further filings will be entertained. Order and docket sheet sent to filer. [Entered: 02/04/2026 01:41 PM]
January 26, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. (Barry G. SILVERMAN, Richard A. PAEZ, Holly A. THOMAS) After considering the opening brief, we dismiss this appeal as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), (e)(2). All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:07 AM]
December 29, 2025 Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Brian Bloodworth [Entered: 12/29/2025 02:08 PM]
December 24, 2025 Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian Bloodworth for Appellee CA EVIVA Owner, LLC, Appellee NACO, LLC. [Entered: 12/24/2025 10:04 AM]
December 1, 2025 Filing 14 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 11 by Appellant Darnell Card is filed. Original and 0 copies. (Briefing remains stayed) [Entered: 01/14/2026 02:53 PM]
December 1, 2025 Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Darnell Card. [Entered: 12/01/2025 03:41 PM]
December 1, 2025 Filing 10 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 12/01/2025 02:11 PM]
October 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. It appears that this appeal may be frivolous. If the appeal is frivolous, the court will deny permission to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement.Briefing is stayed. The motion (Docket Entry No. 8) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is denied as moot. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. The clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. [Entered: 10/24/2025 09:27 AM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Darnell Card. [Entered: 10/20/2025 03:32 PM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Darnell Card. [Entered: 10/20/2025 03:31 PM]
October 20, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Darnell Card. [Entered: 10/20/2025 03:29 PM]
September 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 4) for an extension of time to pay the fees for this appeal is granted. On or before October 20, 2025, appellant must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not do so, the court will dismiss this appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due October 22, 2025. The answering brief is due November 21, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The clerk will serve Form 4 on appellant. [Entered: 09/26/2025 03:56 PM]
August 19, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Darnell Card. [Entered: 08/19/2025 04:46 PM]
August 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. . Response to Fee Order due (Appellant) 9/16/2025 [Entered: 08/19/2025 03:09 PM]
August 11, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/22/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 10/20/2025. For appeal no. 25-5060, 2:25-cv-01936-TLN-CSK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/11/2025 03:31 PM]
August 11, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-01936-TLN-CSK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5060 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/11/2025 03:29 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: NACO, LLC, et al. v. Card
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NACO, LLC
Represented By: Blair Mehigan
Represented By: Brian Bloodworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CA EVIVA OWNER, LLC
Represented By: Brian Bloodworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DARNELL CARD
Represented By: Darnell Card
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?