Duran Saavedra, et al. v. Bondi
Petitioner: ANA RUBY DURAN SAAVEDRA, LUIS MAURICIO CESAR HERNANDEZ, J.C.C.D. and M.C.D.
Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 25-5061
Filed: August 11, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2026 Filing 22 TEXT ORDER FILED. The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 21) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due April 28, 2026.The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 01/23/2026 04:20 PM]
January 22, 2026 Filing 21 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 01/22/2026 11:45 AM]
December 30, 2025 Filing 20 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 19 by Petitioners is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 12/30/2025 03:44 PM]
December 29, 2025 Filing 19 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Ana Ruby Duran Saavedra, Petitioner Luis Mauricio Cesar Hernandez, Petitioner J.C.C.D., Petitioner M.C.D.. [Entered: 12/29/2025 11:05 PM]
December 29, 2025 Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Matt Adams [Entered: 12/29/2025 02:39 PM]
December 29, 2025 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matt Adams for Petitioner Ana Ruby Duran Saavedra, Petitioner J.C.C.D., Petitioner Luis Mauricio Cesar Hernandez, Petitioner M.C.D.. [Entered: 12/29/2025 02:28 PM]
December 1, 2025 Filing 16 OPPOSITION to Supplemental Motion to Stay Removal (DE 15) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 12/01/2025 03:00 PM]
November 24, 2025 Filing 15 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Ana Ruby Duran Saavedra, Petitioner Luis Mauricio Cesar Hernandez, Petitioner J.C.C.D., Petitioner M.C.D.. [Entered: 11/24/2025 02:20 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 14 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due (Respondent) 12/1/2025 [Entered: 11/10/2025 01:08 PM]
November 10, 2025 Filing 13 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Ana Ruby Duran Saavedra, Petitioner Luis Mauricio Cesar Hernandez, Petitioner J.C.C.D., Petitioner M.C.D.. [Entered: 11/10/2025 12:40 PM]
October 27, 2025 Filing 12 TEXT ORDER FILED. The unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due December 29, 2025. The answering brief is due January 28, 2026. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the answering brief is served. [Entered: 10/27/2025 04:58 PM]
October 24, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Petitioner Ana Ruby Duran Saavedra, Petitioner Luis Mauricio Cesar Hernandez, Petitioner J.C.C.D., Petitioner M.C.D.. [Entered: 10/24/2025 04:38 PM]
October 10, 2025 Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Bethany Eichler [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:57 AM]
October 10, 2025 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Bethany Eichler for Petitioner Ana Ruby Duran Saavedra, Petitioner J.C.C.D., Petitioner Luis Mauricio Cesar Hernandez, Petitioner M.C.D.. [Entered: 10/10/2025 09:40 AM]
August 20, 2025 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 08/20/2025 08:27 AM]
August 12, 2025 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Joannabelle Aquino [Entered: 08/12/2025 02:23 PM]
August 12, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joannabelle Aquino for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 08/12/2025 02:19 PM]
August 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 2) is granted. The certified administrative record remains due September 22, 2025. The opening brief is due October 30, 2025. The answering brief is due December 1, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/12/2025 09:14 AM]
August 11, 2025 Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 9/22/2025, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 10/30/2025, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 12/1/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 08/11/2025 03:42 PM]
August 11, 2025 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/11/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5061 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/11/2025 03:39 PM]
August 11, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Ana Ruby Duran Saavedra, Petitioner J.C.C.D., Petitioner Luis Mauricio Cesar Hernandez, Petitioner M.C.D.. [Entered: 08/11/2025 03:38 PM]
August 11, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Ana Ruby Duran Saavedra, Petitioner J.C.C.D., Petitioner Luis Mauricio Cesar Hernandez, Petitioner M.C.D.. [Entered: 08/11/2025 03:38 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Duran Saavedra, et al. v. Bondi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ANA RUBY DURAN SAAVEDRA
Represented By: Bethany Eichler
Represented By: Matt Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LUIS MAURICIO CESAR HERNANDEZ
Represented By: Bethany Eichler
Represented By: Matt Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: J.C.C.D.
Represented By: Bethany Eichler
Represented By: Matt Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: M.C.D.
Represented By: Bethany Eichler
Represented By: Matt Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Ms. Joannabelle Aquino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?