Luehring v. Lee, et al.
Plaintiff: FREDERICK LUEHRING, III
Defendant: EUNMEE LEE, Individual capacity, MAYBELL MANLAGNIT, Individual capacity, DOES, 1 to 25, in their Official and Individual Capacities, EDDIE PARKS and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS - METROPOLITAN
Case Number: 25-5343
Filed: August 22, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2025 Filing 10 PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING and PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring, III. [Entered: 09/30/2025 04:04 PM]
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. (Ryan D. NELSON, Jennifer SUNG, Holly A. THOMAS) This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the August 13, 2025 magistrate judge order is not final or immediately appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also Flam v. Flam, 788 F.3d 1043, 1046 (9th Cir. 2015) (magistrate judge may hear and determine non-dispositive matters under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)). This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/30/2025 07:41 AM]
September 8, 2025 Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Frederick Luehring, III is filed. Original and 0 copies. (briefing remains stayed, motions pending) [Entered: 09/08/2025 10:35 AM] [Edited: 09/08/2025 10:36 AM]
September 5, 2025 Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (DE 5) filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring, III. [Entered: 09/05/2025 06:16 PM]
September 5, 2025 Filing 6 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Frederick Luehring, III. [Entered: 09/05/2025 03:42 PM]
August 29, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring, III. [Entered: 09/02/2025 02:58 PM]
August 29, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Frederick Luehring, III. [Entered: 09/02/2025 02:57 PM]
August 28, 2025 Filing 3 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 08/28/2025 09:32 AM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/1/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 10/31/2025. For appeal no. 25-5343, 2:21-cv-03879-GW-SK. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/22/2025 11:48 AM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-03879-GW-SK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5343 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/22/2025 11:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Luehring v. Lee, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FREDERICK LUEHRING, III
Represented By: Frederick Luehring, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EUNMEE LEE, Individual capacity
Represented By: Mr. Mario Eduardo Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAYBELL MANLAGNIT, Individual capacity
Represented By: Mr. Mario Eduardo Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES, 1 to 25, in their Official and Individual Capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDDIE PARKS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS - METROPOLITAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?