Guzman-Arauz, et al. v. Bondi
| MODESTO ANTONIO GUZMAN-ARAUZ, MARYSOLINA DE LOS ANGELES GRANADOS-GOMEZ, MARYSOLINA DE LOS ANGELES GUZMAN-GRANADOS, MATEO GABRIEL GUZMAN-GRANADOS and JORGE LUIS GUZMAN-GRANADOS |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 25-5347 |
| August 22, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 10 by Petitioner Marysolina De Los Angeles Guzman-Granados, Petitioner Mateo Gabriel Guzman-Granados, Petitioner Jorge Luis Guzman-Granados, Petitioner Modesto Antonio Guzman-Arauz, Petitioner Marysolina De Los Angeles Granados-Gomez is filed. Original and 6 copies. [Entered: 10/14/2025 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Modesto Antonio Guzman-Arauz, Petitioner Marysolina De Los Angeles Granados-Gomez, Petitioner Marysolina De Los Angeles Guzman-Granados, Petitioner Mateo Gabriel Guzman-Granados, Petitioner Jorge Luis Guzman-Granados. [Entered: 10/14/2025 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Stay Proceedings in this Court filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. --[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF of motion.] [Entered: 10/01/2025 10:27 AM] [Edited: 10/01/2025 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 08/29/2025 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Joanna L. Watson [Entered: 08/25/2025 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joanna L. Watson for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 08/25/2025 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 FEE PAID by Law Offices of Aaron Chenault A.P.C. - $600.00 - Receipt No. 100000566 [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 10/1/2025, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 10/22/2025, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 11/10/2025, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 12/10/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/22/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5347 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Jorge Luis Guzman-Granados, Petitioner Marysolina De Los Angeles Granados-Gomez, Petitioner Marysolina De Los Angeles Guzman-Granados, Petitioner Mateo Gabriel Guzman-Granados, Petitioner Modesto Antonio Guzman-Arauz. [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
