Nissan North America, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
Petitioner: NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: ANNA WALL, SANDRA SMITH, LINDA SPRY, LISA SULLIVAN, SHERIDA JOHNSON and SUBRINA SEENARAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Case Number: 25-5367
Filed: August 22, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2025 Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Petitioner Nissan North America, Inc.. [Entered: 09/25/2025 04:00 PM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 08/22/2025 04:58 PM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/22/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5367 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 08/22/2025 04:56 PM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 2 EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Nissan North America, Inc.. [Entered: 08/22/2025 04:53 PM]
August 22, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Nissan North America, Inc.. [Entered: 08/22/2025 04:53 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nissan North America, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Represented By: Mr. Donald Falk
Represented By: Mr. Christopher R. Wray
Represented By: Holly Pauling Smith
Represented By: Mr. Andrew Chang
Represented By: Mr. Amir Nassihi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: ANNA WALL
Represented By: Mr. Mitchell Breit
Represented By: Adam A. Edwards
Represented By: Greg Frederic Coleman
Represented By: Mark E. Silvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: SANDRA SMITH
Represented By: Mr. Mitchell Breit
Represented By: Adam A. Edwards
Represented By: Greg Frederic Coleman
Represented By: Mark E. Silvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: LINDA SPRY
Represented By: Mr. Mitchell Breit
Represented By: Adam A. Edwards
Represented By: Greg Frederic Coleman
Represented By: Mark E. Silvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: LISA SULLIVAN
Represented By: Mr. Mitchell Breit
Represented By: Adam A. Edwards
Represented By: Greg Frederic Coleman
Represented By: Mark E. Silvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: SHERIDA JOHNSON
Represented By: Mr. Mitchell Breit
Represented By: Adam A. Edwards
Represented By: Greg Frederic Coleman
Represented By: Mark E. Silvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Real party in interest: SUBRINA SEENARAIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Mr. Mitchell Breit
Represented By: Adam A. Edwards
Represented By: Greg Frederic Coleman
Represented By: Mark E. Silvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?