Gomez-Hernandez v. Bondi
Petitioner: ERICK GOMEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 25-5372
Filed: August 25, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2025 Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 09/11/2025 10:01 AM]
August 29, 2025 Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Erick Gomez-Hernandez. [Entered: 08/29/2025 11:08 AM]
August 25, 2025 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent John D. Williams [Entered: 08/25/2025 11:46 AM]
August 25, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John D. Williams for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 08/25/2025 11:38 AM]
August 25, 2025 Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 10/6/2025, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 10/27/2025, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 11/13/2025, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 12/15/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 08/25/2025 07:45 AM]
August 25, 2025 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/23/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5372 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/25/2025 07:43 AM]
August 23, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/25/2025 07:42 AM]
August 23, 2025 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 7/29/2025. [Entered: 08/25/2025 07:42 AM]
August 23, 2025 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Erick Gomez-Hernandez. [Entered: 08/25/2025 07:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gomez-Hernandez v. Bondi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ERICK GOMEZ-HERNANDEZ
Represented By: Nicholas W. Marchi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Mr. John D. Williams
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?