Smith v. Uttecht
| ALAN JUSTIN SMITH |
| JEFF UTTECHT, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center |
| 25-5394 |
| August 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT SENT. Sent: Petitioner - Alan Justin Smith form 34 per request. [Entered: 10/20/2025 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for Public Information filed by Appellant Alan Justin Smith. [Entered: 10/20/2025 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Extend Time to File Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Alan Justin Smith. [Entered: 10/20/2025 03:22 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. This case appears to arise from the denial of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion in 28 U.S.C. 2254 proceedings and thus is subject to the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). See Martinez v. Shinn, 33 F.4th 1254, 1261 (9th Cir. 2022), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 584 (2023). This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability at the courts earliest convenience. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). If the district court issues a certificate of appealability, the court should specify the issues that meet the required showing; if the district court declines to issue a certificate, the court is requested to state its reasons. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district judge. [Entered: 09/25/2025 08:51 AM]
|
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellee Jeff Uttecht. [Entered: 08/26/2025 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. No COA order in district court. [Entered: 08/25/2025 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-00940-TL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5394 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/25/2025 02:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Smith v. Uttecht | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ALAN JUSTIN SMITH | |
| Represented By: | Alan Justin Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JEFF UTTECHT, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Mark Fowler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
